Talk:Disability weights: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Formula?) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
|Dispute= Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name. | |Dispute= Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name. | ||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |||
|Argumentation = | |||
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | |||
}} | |||
== Normalizing DALY weights? == | |||
{{discussion | |||
|Dispute= Normalizing DALY weights has been proposed as a solution towards the fact that uncertainty in smaal DALY weights affect overall uncertainty much more than uncertainty in large weights. Does anyone know how this might work? | |||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:39, 17 February 2009
Formula?
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
|
Normalizing DALY weights?
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
|