Template:Self-evaluation: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|{{highlight|This page has been self-evaluated by the authors. The grade is {{#if:{{{1|}}}|'''{{{1}}}'''|'''Not graded'''}}.}} <br>{{#if:{{{2|}}}|<br>Evaluator: {{{2}}}|}}
|{{highlight|This page has been self-evaluated by the authors. The grade is {{#if:{{{1|}}}|'''{{{1}}}'''|'''Not graded'''}}.}} <br>{{#if:{{{2|}}}|<br>Evaluator: {{{2}}}|}}
|-----
|-----
|The basis for the evaluation is the amount and type of work performed. Possible grades:
|The basis for the evaluation is the amount and type of work performed. [[:Category:Quality of an object|Evaluation criteria]].
* '''Unstructured''': The page does not (yet) have a proper structure and/or estimate.
* '''Placeholder''': an estimate based on guesswork rather than data. However, the page is structured in the right way and has the desired functionality (e.g. as a part of a model).
* '''Preliminary''': an estimate based on maybe one piece of evidence. Reliability has not been evaluated.
* '''Draft''': an estimate based on several independent pieces of evidence. Reliability of at least some pieces is considered adequate.
* '''Review''': an estimate based on a systematic literature review and a formal method to derive a result based on the evidence.
|}
|}


<noinclude>[[Category:Quality control]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:Quality control]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 10:02, 10 September 2008

Self-evaluation
This page has been self-evaluated by the authors. The grade is Not graded.
The basis for the evaluation is the amount and type of work performed. Evaluation criteria.