Template:Peer review: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(first draft based on Template:Self-evaluation)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
{{#if:{{{2|}}}|<br>Reviewer: {{{2}}}|}}
{{#if:{{{2|}}}|<br>Reviewer: {{{2}}}|}}
|-----
|-----
|The basis for the review is the quality of work performed. Possible grades:
|The basis for the review is the quality of work performed. [[:Category:Quality of an object|Possible grades]].
* '''Unacceptable''': The page does not comply with minimum standards of scientific work.
* '''Acceptable''': The page has utilised acceptable scientific methods in a proper way, and sufficient scientific critique has been applied.
* '''State-of-the-art''': The page has been developed using state-of-the-art scientific methods and information.
* '''Outstanding''': The page has been developed using highly innovative methods and/or data.
|}
|}


<noinclude>[[Category:Quality control]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:Quality control]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 10:01, 10 September 2008

Peer review
This page has been peer reviewed by an independent expert of the field.
The grade is Not graded.
The basis for the review is the quality of work performed. Possible grades.
Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=Template:Peer_review&oldid=6369"