Policy arena effect: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(first draft based on the thesis) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The arena effect relates to the ida of different knowledge production modes introduced by Gibbons et al, 2000. Mode 1 is the traditional knowledge production context, while mode 2 is institutionally distributed, produced in a context of application, problem-driven, and transdisciplinary. | The arena effect relates to the ida of different knowledge production modes introduced by Gibbons et al, 2000. Mode 1 is the traditional knowledge production context, while mode 2 is institutionally distributed, produced in a context of application, problem-driven, and transdisciplinary. | ||
{|{{prettytable}} | {|{{prettytable}} | ||
+The four policy arenas. | |+The four policy arenas. | ||
! | ! | ||
! Placid | ! Placid | ||
Revision as of 20:21, 12 August 2008
Policy arena refers to governance of new applications science and technology, and arena effect is a concept for describing different approaches that this governance can take. The arena can be divided into four different areas according to two different dimensions: 1) actor induced: placid arenas or polarised arenas; 2) institutional: hierarchical arenas of participatory arenas. This typology has been developed by Mikko Rask. [1]
The arena effect relates to the ida of different knowledge production modes introduced by Gibbons et al, 2000. Mode 1 is the traditional knowledge production context, while mode 2 is institutionally distributed, produced in a context of application, problem-driven, and transdisciplinary.
| Placid | Polarized | |
|---|---|---|
| Hierarchic | Mountain massif "Arena stabilized" | Volcano "Arena alarmed" |
| Participatory | Prairie "Arena expanded" | Rapids "Arena floated" |
References
- ↑ Mikko Rask: Expansion of expertise in the governance of science and technology. Dissertations of the National Consumer Research Centre 4, Helsinki, 2008. ISBN 978-951-698-187-4