Talk:Bus engine technology: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(area discussion resolved)
Line 19: Line 19:
{{defend_invalid|#(1): |Decision variables cannot be quantified, since they describe decisions or scenarios. They therefore don’t have a formula or unit, or any up- or downstream variables. Is a decision variable actually a variable at all…?|--[[User:Anne.knol|Anne.knol]] 17:24, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}
{{defend_invalid|#(1): |Decision variables cannot be quantified, since they describe decisions or scenarios. They therefore don’t have a formula or unit, or any up- or downstream variables. Is a decision variable actually a variable at all…?|--[[User:Anne.knol|Anne.knol]] 17:24, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}
:{{attack|#(2): |The scope of a decision variable is: ”Which are plausible decision options in this situation (description of the situation)?) The definition contains information about how you know which options actually exist and are plausible in the defined situation. The result lists all plausible policy options. It should be noticed that the result of the decision variable does not necessarily match the decision scenarios of a particular assessment.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 17:55, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}  
:{{attack|#(2): |The scope of a decision variable is: ”Which are plausible decision options in this situation (description of the situation)?) The definition contains information about how you know which options actually exist and are plausible in the defined situation. The result lists all plausible policy options. It should be noticed that the result of the decision variable does not necessarily match the decision scenarios of a particular assessment.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 17:55, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}  
{{comment|#(3): |What about the unit and formula?|--[[User:Anne.knol|Anne.knol]] 17:57, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}
}}
}}
===Re: Decision variables -- [[User:Anne.knol|Anne.knol]] 17:57, 20 February 2008 (EET)===

Revision as of 15:57, 20 February 2008

Scope -- Anne.knol 17:13, 20 February 2008 (EET)

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←--#(1):: . Engine technology alternatives are independent of the region --Anne.knol 17:13, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

←--#(2):: . The engine technology alternatives are not dependent on Helsinki Metropolitan Area --Jgrellier 17:21, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

←--#(4):: . Bus engine technology is dependent on broad geographical area e.g. western Europe vs. India --Jgrellier 17:21, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

←--#(3):: . Then we should add a broad geographical area (e.g. western Europe) instead of Helsinki --Anne.knol 17:26, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
←--#(5):: . I agree. The scope should be changed into "the western Europe". --Jouni 17:55, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Decision variables -- Anne.knol 17:13, 20 February 2008 (EET)

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←--#(1):: . Decision variables cannot be quantified, since they describe decisions or scenarios. They therefore don’t have a formula or unit, or any up- or downstream variables. Is a decision variable actually a variable at all…? --Anne.knol 17:24, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

⇤--#(2):: . The scope of a decision variable is: ”Which are plausible decision options in this situation (description of the situation)?) The definition contains information about how you know which options actually exist and are plausible in the defined situation. The result lists all plausible policy options. It should be noticed that the result of the decision variable does not necessarily match the decision scenarios of a particular assessment. --Jouni 17:55, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
----#(3):: . What about the unit and formula? --Anne.knol 17:57, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)

Re: Decision variables -- Anne.knol 17:57, 20 February 2008 (EET)