ERF of PFAS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Data) |
(→Data) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<t2b index="Exposure agent,Response,Exposure,Exposure unit,ER function,Scaling,Observation" locations="Threshold,ERF" desc="Description" unit="-"> | <t2b index="Exposure agent,Response,Exposure,Exposure unit,ER function,Scaling,Observation" locations="Threshold,ERF" desc="Description" unit="-"> | ||
PFAS|PFAS TWI|Maternal exposure via ingestion|ng /kg /wk|TWI|BW|0|4.4|EFSA 2020 | PFAS|PFAS TWI|Maternal exposure via ingestion|ng /kg /wk|TWI|BW|0|4.4|EFSA 2020 | ||
PFAS|Immunosuppression|Maternal ingested intake|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0. | PFAS|Immunosuppression|Maternal ingested intake|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0-0.0454|Converted from the row above assuming linearity and steady state | ||
PFAS|Cholesterol increase|Ingestion|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0|EFSA? | PFAS|Cholesterol increase|Ingestion|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0|EFSA? | ||
PFAS|Decreased birth weight|Ingestion|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0|EFSA? | PFAS|Decreased birth weight|Ingestion|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0|EFSA? | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
</t2b> | </t2b> | ||
Immunosuppression is not well quantified. Here we assume that at the tolerable weekly intate (TWI) level, | Immunosuppression is not well quantified. Here we assume that at the tolerable weekly intate (TWI) level, 0-20 % of respiratory infections are attributable to PFAS. Although age is not specified in the table, PFAS exposure is highest in infants due to pregnancy and breast feeding. Therefore we assume that immunosuppression occurs mainly at ages 0-9 a. The TWI comes from EFSA<ref>EFSA. (2020) Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223</ref>. | ||
=== Calculations === | === Calculations === |
Revision as of 04:06, 26 February 2021
Moderator:Jouni (see all) |
|
Upload data
|
In Opasnet many pages being worked on and are in different classes of progression. Thus the information on those pages should be regarded with consideration. The progression class of this page has been assessed:
|
This page needs a curator. Learn more about curating Opasnet pages.
The quality was last checked: 2021-01-29. |
Question
What are the exposure-response functions (ERF) of perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) on several health endpoints?
Answer
Rationale
Data
Obs | Exposure agent | Response | Exposure | Exposure unit | ER function | Scaling | Threshold | ERF | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PFAS | PFAS TWI | Maternal exposure via ingestion | ng /kg /wk | TWI | BW | 0 | 4.4 | EFSA 2020 |
2 | PFAS | Immunosuppression | Maternal ingested intake | ng /kg /wk | ERS | BW | 0 | 0-0.0454 | Converted from the row above assuming linearity and steady state |
3 | PFAS | Cholesterol increase | Ingestion | ng /kg /wk | ERS | BW | 0 | 0 | EFSA? |
4 | PFAS | Decreased birth weight | Ingestion | ng /kg /wk | ERS | BW | 0 | 0 | EFSA? |
5 | PFAS | Increased ALT | Ingestion | ng /kg /wk | ERS | BW | 0 | 0 | EFSA? |
Immunosuppression is not well quantified. Here we assume that at the tolerable weekly intate (TWI) level, 0-20 % of respiratory infections are attributable to PFAS. Although age is not specified in the table, PFAS exposure is highest in infants due to pregnancy and breast feeding. Therefore we assume that immunosuppression occurs mainly at ages 0-9 a. The TWI comes from EFSA[1].
Calculations
Initiation 2021-01-29
See also
References
- ↑ EFSA. (2020) Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223