ERF of PFAS: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:
<t2b index="Exposure agent,Response,Exposure,Exposure unit,ER function,Scaling,Observation" locations="Threshold,ERF" desc="Description" unit="-">
<t2b index="Exposure agent,Response,Exposure,Exposure unit,ER function,Scaling,Observation" locations="Threshold,ERF" desc="Description" unit="-">
PFAS|PFAS TWI|Maternal exposure via ingestion|ng /kg /wk|TWI|BW|0|4.4|EFSA 2020
PFAS|PFAS TWI|Maternal exposure via ingestion|ng /kg /wk|TWI|BW|0|4.4|EFSA 2020
PFAS|Immunosuppression|Maternal ingested intake|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0.0227|Converted from the row above assuming linearity and steady state
PFAS|Immunosuppression|Maternal ingested intake|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0-0.0454|Converted from the row above assuming linearity and steady state
PFAS|Cholesterol increase|Ingestion|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0|EFSA?
PFAS|Cholesterol increase|Ingestion|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0|EFSA?
PFAS|Decreased birth weight|Ingestion|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0|EFSA?
PFAS|Decreased birth weight|Ingestion|ng /kg /wk|ERS|BW|0|0|EFSA?
Line 27: Line 27:
</t2b>
</t2b>


Immunosuppression is not well quantified. Here we assume that at the tolerable weekly intate (TWI) level, 10 % of respiratory infections are attributable to PFAS. The TWI comes from EFSA<ref>EFSA. (2020) Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223</ref>.
Immunosuppression is not well quantified. Here we assume that at the tolerable weekly intate (TWI) level, 0-20 % of respiratory infections are attributable to PFAS. Although age is not specified in the table, PFAS exposure is highest in infants due to pregnancy and breast feeding. Therefore we assume that immunosuppression occurs mainly at ages 0-9 a. The TWI comes from EFSA<ref>EFSA. (2020) Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223</ref>.


=== Calculations ===
=== Calculations ===

Revision as of 04:06, 26 February 2021


Progression class
In Opasnet many pages being worked on and are in different classes of progression. Thus the information on those pages should be regarded with consideration. The progression class of this page has been assessed:
This page is a draft
The relevat content and structure of the page is already present, but there still is a lot of missing content.
This page needs a curator. Learn more about curating Opasnet pages.

The quality was last checked: 2021-01-29.


Question

What are the exposure-response functions (ERF) of perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) on several health endpoints?

Answer

Rationale

Data

ERF of PFAS: Difference between revisions(-)
ObsExposure agentResponseExposureExposure unitER functionScalingThresholdERFDescription
1PFASPFAS TWIMaternal exposure via ingestionng /kg /wkTWIBW04.4EFSA 2020
2PFASImmunosuppressionMaternal ingested intakeng /kg /wkERSBW00-0.0454Converted from the row above assuming linearity and steady state
3PFASCholesterol increaseIngestionng /kg /wkERSBW00EFSA?
4PFASDecreased birth weightIngestionng /kg /wkERSBW00EFSA?
5PFASIncreased ALTIngestionng /kg /wkERSBW00EFSA?

Immunosuppression is not well quantified. Here we assume that at the tolerable weekly intate (TWI) level, 0-20 % of respiratory infections are attributable to PFAS. Although age is not specified in the table, PFAS exposure is highest in infants due to pregnancy and breast feeding. Therefore we assume that immunosuppression occurs mainly at ages 0-9 a. The TWI comes from EFSA[1].

Calculations

Initiation 2021-01-29

+ Show code

See also

References

  1. EFSA. (2020) Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluoroalkyl substances in food. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6223