Congestion charge: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(pages changed to an assessment)
Line 42: Line 42:
* [[Voting age]]
* [[Voting age]]
* [[Structure of shared understanding]]
* [[Structure of shared understanding]]
* Osmo Soininvaara: Why we should have congestion charge. 3.4.2017 [http://www.soininvaara.fi/2017/04/03/kaupunkirakentamisen-aika-35-ruuhkamaksut/]
* Helsinki: Regional congestion charge would improve air quality in Helsinki. 3.5.2017 [http://www.hel.fi/www/uutiset/fi/ymparistokeskus/ruuhkamaksu-030517] [http://www.hel.fi/www/uutiset/fi/ymparistokeskus/ruuhkamaksu-030517?pd=v]


== Add a discussion item, relation, or evaluation ==
== Add a discussion item, relation, or evaluation ==

Revision as of 08:17, 11 May 2017



Question

What reasons are there for implementing or not implementing a congestion charging system in a city? What values and combinations of values result in which combination?

Boundaries

  • The questions are generic, but we aim to look at the issue also specifically in Helsinki.
  • We look at the current situation.

Intended use and users

  • ----#: . Who could use this information and how? Fill in your thoughts. --Jouni (talk) 11:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)

Participants

Decisions and scenarios

----#: . What options do exist? Fill in your thoughts. --Jouni (talk) 11:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)

Timing

The assessment will be performed during April-May 2017.

Answer

Not found yet.

Rationale

Dependencies

  • ----#: . Add links to pages that belong to this assessment. --Jouni (talk) 11:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)

See also

Add a discussion item, relation, or evaluation