User:Ehab Mustafa: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 159: Line 159:
*Area: geographical area of Rotterdam City
*Area: geographical area of Rotterdam City
*Time: Change Adaptation Strategy has been developed in October 2013 with the aim of making Rotterdam climate proof by 2025. <ref> Rotterdam Climate Change Adaptation Strategy [http://www.rotterdamclimateinitiative.nl/documents/2015-en-ouder/Documenten/20121210_RAS_EN_lr_versie_4.pdf] </ref>
*Time: Change Adaptation Strategy has been developed in October 2013 with the aim of making Rotterdam climate proof by 2025. <ref> Rotterdam Climate Change Adaptation Strategy [http://www.rotterdamclimateinitiative.nl/documents/2015-en-ouder/Documenten/20121210_RAS_EN_lr_versie_4.pdf] </ref>
*Noted factors:
**Water levels for outer-dike areas
**Water levels for dikes and inner-dike areas
**Extreme rainfall
**Drought
**High temperatures


== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 16:01, 17 April 2017

DARM, 2017 Homework

Homework 1

←--#: . Very good! --Jouni (talk) 08:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Homework 1a: Open policy practice

2. What is shared understanding?

A situation where all individual (assessors, managers, stakeholders) are able to correctly explain what the other thinks about a certain topic and why, including information on:

  • Objective pursued
  • considered decision options
  • possible outcomes
  • selected decision option
  • consequence of policy implementation

This definition can be extended also to a larger group. Here shared understanding is a written description of the topic that covers the thinking and reasoning on the topic of all members.


7. What is open assessment?

Open assessment is a method that attempts to answer the following research question and to apply the answer in practical assessments: how can scientific information (based on information) and value judgments (based on individuals opinions) be organised for improving societal decision-making in a situation where open participation is allowed?


8. What are the dimensions of openness?

Dimensions of Openness
Dimension Explanation
Scope of participation Who are allowed to participate?
Access to information What information is available?
Timing of openness When are participants invited or allowed to participate?
Scope of contribution To which aspects of the issue are participants invited or allowed to contribute?
Impact of contribution How much are participant contributions allowed to have influence on the outcomes? In other words, how much weight is given to participant contributions?

Homework 1b: Learn the terms in Quizlet

Done, It was really interesting to paly the flip-cards thing and taking knowledge assessment test as well.

Homework 1c: Introduction to critical thinking

Done, most of videos were watched. Most of exercises were performed.

Homework 1d: Introduction to probabilities

Done, most of videos were watched. Most of exercises were performed.

Homework 3

←--#: . Excellent! --Jouni (talk) 08:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Task 1

  1. I think definition of convergence was not clearly stated, it would be great if we discuss more about it the lecture.
  2. I'm not an expert in statistics, it is not my area of specialty. In turn, I found it a bit difficult to understand the following terms;
  • Binomial distribution
  • Beta-binomial distribution
  • Correlated binomial distribution
  • Bernoulli distribution
  • Gamma distribution

It will be appreciated if more information in this regard is offered.

Task 2

Co-creation is a process in which valued outcomes are produced by bringing different parties (e.g. companies and customers) all together. In context of business system, consumers appreciated when they are able to see their their influence not only in the exchange point of goods but also in designing products, developing production processes, crafting marketing messages, and controlling sales channels. In environmental risk assessment regard, it also involves that modelers help decision makers to get answers through performing quantitative risk assessment. It Emphasize on the Joint effort to collaboratively produce information, typically supported by facilitators and performed utilising online tools.

Advantages of co-creation over traditional decision support process include:

  1. it builds trust among participants and outside observers
  2. it is an efficient way to ensure that all relevant issues are raised and handled properly
  3. it facilitates learning when all information is easily available to everyone

Facilitator is meant to handle the task of creating collaboration, facilitator usually helps any of possible participants to express their opinion.

A good facilitator should have following skills:

Skills of Good Facilitator
Skill Explanation
Enthusiasm A good facilitator should be able to motivate participants to express their opinions by helping participants with unfamiliar tools or letting them use their own tools and then translating the information into the workspace.
Textuality A good facilitator should be capable of producing and converting information into practical textual formats.
Openness A good facilitator should be accessible by participants with no restrictions.
Modelling A good facilitator should have sufficient capabilities to use probabilities, statistics and different ways of modelling to
Web-workspaces supporting A good facilitator should be satisfied by sufficient skills regarding dealing with different and updated tools of software.

Homework 4

Scope

Question

  • How city of Rotterdam will be climate-proof city and structurally take into account the long-term foreseeable climate change in different area of

spatial development, while allowing for any associated uncertainties?

Intended use and users

The assessment is to serve the city of Rotterdam authorities indicating which measures can be implemented in the various parts of the city in order to combat the effects of climate change and discusses where opportunities lie. A number of instruments are available to support the implementation.

Participants

  • Rotterdam City Council
  • Set boundaries to the assessment and action plans
  • Supervision and evaluation of implemented measures
  • Wide range of consultants from different business
  • Assessment of placing the essential infrastructure and other frameworks adopted.
  • Assessment of suggesting tool for measure the public awareness.
  • Any possible stakeholders
  • Ensure the assessment openness, acceptability, and effectiveness.
  • Interest groups
  • Consider environment and population

Boundaries

  • Area: geographical area of Rotterdam City
  • Time: Change Adaptation Strategy has been developed in October 2013 with the aim of making Rotterdam climate proof by 2025. [1]
  • Noted factors:
    • Water levels for outer-dike areas
    • Water levels for dikes and inner-dike areas
    • Extreme rainfall
    • Drought
    • High temperatures

References

  1. Rotterdam Climate Change Adaptation Strategy [1]