Talk:Dealing with disputes: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Notation of a ''non-mixed'' difference in opinion -- ~~~~)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Notation of a ''non-mixed'' difference in opinion -- [[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 13:10, 6 February 2008 (EET) ==
== Notation of a ''non-mixed'' difference in opinion ==


{{comment|#(1): |What kind of symbols do I have to use, if I only doubt a standpoint but do not have an opposite standpoint, i.e. a ''non-mixed difference of opinion''? Should I still use the attacking argument symbol (red arrow) or the comment symbol (the blue horizontal stripe)?|--[[User:Sjuurd|Sjuurd]] 16:08, 5 June 2007 (EEST)}}
{{comment|#(1): |What kind of symbols do I have to use, if I only doubt a standpoint but do not have an opposite standpoint, i.e. a ''non-mixed difference of opinion''? Should I still use the attacking argument symbol (red arrow) or the comment symbol (the blue horizontal stripe)?|--[[User:Sjuurd|Sjuurd]] 16:08, 5 June 2007 (EEST)}}


{{comment|#(2): |Well, we don't currently have arrow of doubt. Maybe this depends how strongly you are in doubt. I would prefer red arrow|--[[User:Juha Villman|Juha Villman]] 09:35, 11 June 2007 (EEST)}}
{{comment|#(2): |Well, we don't currently have arrow of doubt. Maybe this depends how strongly you are in doubt. I would prefer red arrow|--[[User:Juha Villman|Juha Villman]] 09:35, 11 June 2007 (EEST)}}

Revision as of 11:13, 6 February 2008

Notation of a non-mixed difference in opinion

----#(1):: . What kind of symbols do I have to use, if I only doubt a standpoint but do not have an opposite standpoint, i.e. a non-mixed difference of opinion? Should I still use the attacking argument symbol (red arrow) or the comment symbol (the blue horizontal stripe)? --Sjuurd 16:08, 5 June 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)

----#(2):: . Well, we don't currently have arrow of doubt. Maybe this depends how strongly you are in doubt. I would prefer red arrow --Juha Villman 09:35, 11 June 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)