User:Mari Malinen: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 43: Line 43:


=== Intended use and users ===
=== Intended use and users ===
Helsinki Metropolitan area city authorities


=== Participants ===
=== Participants ===

Revision as of 08:08, 26 March 2015

Homework 1

What is shared understanding?

  • All participants understand what decision options are considered, desired outcomes, objectives, facts, opinions and disagreements exist and why. Also why a certain decision option is selected.
  • Everyone understands the whole picture without having to agree with each other.


What different purposes are there for participation in assessment and/or decision making?

  • Openness builds trust among participants and outside observers.
  • To make sure all relevant issues are raised and handled properly
  • Through successful critique invalid statements can be ruled out from the assessment


What is benefit-risk assessment?

  • Analyzing different scientific data to compare benefits and risks of an event, activity, food etc.
  • For example assessing use of food additives: do the benefits outweigh possible risks?

←--#: . OK. --Jouni (talk) 10:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)


Homework 2

  • What could an Universal object be in an assessment?
  • Is the Training assessment similar to the assignment we are going to do during the course?

DARM 2015 Homework 4


Scope

Question

What measures can be taken in Helsinki Metropolitan area to control climate change?

Intended use and users

Helsinki Metropolitan area city authorities

Participants

Boundaries

Decisions and scenarios

Timing

Answer

Results

Conclusions

Rationale

Upload a causal diagram and change the right name here.
Add a legend for your diagram.

Stakeholders

Dependencies

Analyses

Indices

Calculations

See also

Keywords

References


Related files