Comparison criteria: Difference between revisions
(commenting tool added) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Question == | == Question == | ||
Which comparison criteria should be used | Which comparison criteria should be used in the | ||
* Possible comparison criteria include | tendering process for the selection of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine to be included in the national vaccination programme for children in Finland? | ||
** | (The tendering process will be initiated during autumn 2014.) | ||
** Benefits | * Possible comparison criteria include price, benefits, safety and technical properties. | ||
** Price refers to the bargaining price of the vaccine. | |||
** Benefits refer to the decrease in disease burden caused by large scale use of the vaccine. As a result health care costs decrease and the quality of life attributed to improved health increases. | |||
** Safety | ** Safety | ||
** Technical properties | ** Technical properties | ||
* The benefits of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine | * The benefits of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine are quantified by the decrease of disease caused by pneumococcus and Haemophilus influenzae -bacteria. | ||
* The | * The benefits are assessed in the entire Finnish population. | ||
== Answer == | == Answer == | ||
The | The tentative proposal is that the comparison is based on price and assessed benefits. Benefits are quantified as the expected decrease in invasive pneumococcal disease incidence due to vaccination. | ||
The tentative proposal is the basis for the conversation beginning in the summer of 2014. | |||
== Rationale == | == Rationale == |
Revision as of 10:04, 8 July 2014
[show] |
---|
In Opasnet many pages being worked on and are in different classes of progression. Thus the information on those pages should be regarded with consideration. The progression class of this page has been assessed:
|
This page needs a curator. Learn more about curating Opasnet pages. |
Question
Which comparison criteria should be used in the tendering process for the selection of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine to be included in the national vaccination programme for children in Finland? (The tendering process will be initiated during autumn 2014.)
- Possible comparison criteria include price, benefits, safety and technical properties.
- Price refers to the bargaining price of the vaccine.
- Benefits refer to the decrease in disease burden caused by large scale use of the vaccine. As a result health care costs decrease and the quality of life attributed to improved health increases.
- Safety
- Technical properties
- The benefits of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine are quantified by the decrease of disease caused by pneumococcus and Haemophilus influenzae -bacteria.
- The benefits are assessed in the entire Finnish population.
Answer
The tentative proposal is that the comparison is based on price and assessed benefits. Benefits are quantified as the expected decrease in invasive pneumococcal disease incidence due to vaccination. The tentative proposal is the basis for the conversation beginning in the summer of 2014.
Rationale
The procurement law(?) only allows clearly demonstrated differences proportionable to the benefits of products as comparison criteria. Practirally often especially so called technical differences cannot be taken into account. There have been no differences in the safety demonstrated in licenced pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.
See also
Comment the content