Open science: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* [http://biorxiv.org/ BioRxiv], a preprint server for life sciences. [http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2013/11/new-preprint-server-aims-be-biologists-answer-physicists-arxiv ScienceInsider article] about BioRxiv. | * [http://biorxiv.org/ BioRxiv], a preprint server for life sciences. [http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2013/11/new-preprint-server-aims-be-biologists-answer-physicists-arxiv ScienceInsider article] about BioRxiv. | ||
* [http://f1000research.com/why-submit F1000Research], an open access journal for the life sciences. Publishes manuscripts before peer review. | * [http://f1000research.com/why-submit F1000Research], an open access journal for the life sciences. Publishes manuscripts before peer review. | ||
** [http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/66.full.pdf Interview of Vitek Tracz] in Science. | |||
* [http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble The Economist: Trouble at the lab]. Unreliable research: Scientists like to think of science as self-correcting. To an alarming degree, it is not. | |||
Revision as of 09:23, 9 December 2013
This page is a encyclopedia article.
The page identifier is Op_en5471 |
|---|
| Moderator:Jouni (see all) |
| This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page. |
| Upload data
|
Open science is a way of making scientific research. The idea is to immediately share everything that is not secret due to e.g. privacy issues, and in a collaborative manner develop shared understanding about the topic at hand.
See also
- Thomas Lin: Cracking open the scientific process. The New Your Times, Jan 16, 2012 [1].
- PeerJ, an online Peer-reviewed journal and a preprint server.
- BioRxiv, a preprint server for life sciences. ScienceInsider article about BioRxiv.
- F1000Research, an open access journal for the life sciences. Publishes manuscripts before peer review.
- Interview of Vitek Tracz in Science.
- The Economist: Trouble at the lab. Unreliable research: Scientists like to think of science as self-correcting. To an alarming degree, it is not.