Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Variable:Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation in ecological risk assessment moved to Variable:Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation: 'In ecological risk assessment' is not necessary in the title.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===Definition=== | ===Definition=== | ||
There is no effective way to use this function because the term natural is ambiguous.{{Reslink| | There is no effective way to use this function because the term natural is ambiguous.{{Reslink|Can 'natural' be effectively used as a criterion?}} | ||
===Result=== | ===Result=== | ||
As a [[Help:Function|function]], there is a result only given some parameters, and the default values have not been defined. | As a [[Help:Function|function]], there is a result only given some parameters, and the default values have not been defined. | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 27 December 2006
Scope:
Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation is a function that describes how to use the property 'natural' in priority setting. It is mainly used in ecological risk assessment.
Description
What does natural mean?
- Opposition to man-made
- Opposition to technological
- Belongs to nature or is commin in nature
- Original state of the world, before or without the impact of humans.
Natural is preferred over non-natural.
Definition
There is no effective way to use this function because the term natural is ambiguous.R↻
Result
As a function, there is a result only given some parameters, and the default values have not been defined.