Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (titles added) |
(first draft) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Scope''': | |||
'''Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation''' is a [[Help:Function|function]] that describes how to use the property 'natural' in priority setting. It is mainly used in ecological risk assessment. | |||
===Description=== | ===Description=== | ||
What does natural mean? | |||
*Opposition to man-made | |||
*Opposition to technological | |||
*Belongs to nature or is commin in nature | |||
*Original state of the world, before or without the impact of humans. | |||
Natural is preferred over non-natural. | |||
===Definition=== | ===Definition=== | ||
There is no effective way to use this function because the term natural is ambiguous.{{Reslink|The ambiguity of the term 'natural'}} | |||
===Result=== | ===Result=== | ||
As a [[Help:Function|function]], there is a result only given some parameters, and the default values have not been defined. |
Revision as of 15:50, 27 December 2006
Scope:
Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation is a function that describes how to use the property 'natural' in priority setting. It is mainly used in ecological risk assessment.
Description
What does natural mean?
- Opposition to man-made
- Opposition to technological
- Belongs to nature or is commin in nature
- Original state of the world, before or without the impact of humans.
Natural is preferred over non-natural.
Definition
There is no effective way to use this function because the term natural is ambiguous.R↻
Result
As a function, there is a result only given some parameters, and the default values have not been defined.