ERF of wind turbine noise on annoyance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added category: 'Noise') |
(Added category: 'Noise ERFs') |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Noise]] | [[Category:Noise]] | ||
[[Category:Noise ERFs]] |
Latest revision as of 23:18, 6 April 2011
Moderator:Erkki Kuusisto (see all) |
This page is a stub. You may improve it into a full page. |
Upload data
|
Scope
What is currently the most reliable ERF of wind turbine noise on the prevalence of annoyance?
Note: Noise annoyance due to wind turbines is known (or can be assumed) to be affected by non-acoustic factors such as noise sensitivity, personal attitude to wind power in general, personal attitude to the particular wind power plant in question, and visual interference.
For the scope of this variable, only ERFs based on noise descriptor(s) as the predictor variable(s) are considered, thus averaging out any modifying effects by the non-acoustic variables listed above.
Definition
Data
Description of the data used for obtaining the value of the variable (e.g. measurement data; mathematical method and its parameters).
Please include references (preferably using the <ref> </ref> tags) and links to original data, as appropriate.
Dependencies
List of upstream variables. The variables can be listed used descriptive (free-format) names or unambiguous identifiers (e.g. Analytica IDs).
Unit
Unit in which the result is expressed.
Formula
Algebra or other explicit methods if possible (e.g. Analytica code between the <anacode> </anacode> tags).
Result
If possible, a numerical expression or distribution.
See also
Links to relevant information that does not belong to Definition.
Keywords
References
...will appear here automatically, if cited above using the <ref> </ref> tags. Additional references can also be listed here.
Related files
<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>