Talk:Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Indicators: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Marjaleena (talk | contribs) |
Marjaleena (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|Statement = There are no plans to build MSWI in Tampere. | |Statement = There are no plans to build MSWI in Tampere. | ||
|Outcome = | |Outcome = | ||
|Argumentation = The web pages of SYKE and local Environmental authorities' lists do not have a plan of MSWI in Tampere. Ongoing environmental impact assesments (Vireillä olevat YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7494&lan=fi) and finished environmental impact assesments (Päättyneet YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7495&lan=fi) | |Argumentation = The web pages of SYKE and local Environmental authorities' lists do not have a plan of MSWI in Tampere. Tampere was not mentioned in lists of Ongoing environmental impact assesments (Vireillä olevat YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7494&lan=fi) and finished environmental impact assesments (Päättyneet YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7495&lan=fi) or list of environmental permits of Western Finland Environmental Permit Authority 2004-2006 (http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7613&lan=fi) and Pirkanmaa Regional Environmental Centre 2002-2006 (http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=8321&lan=fi) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 11:42, 28 September 2006
- Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case
- Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö
Well-being of the population (smells, comfort, noise)
Kari Auri
Discussion on well-being indicators
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
|
Effects on economy (esp. gas energy plant)
Juha
Discussion on effect on economy
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
Probably it could be possible to use also ash produced by MSWI? In Elimäki new factory was started where they produce forest fertilizer from the ash, which means that ash is not waste any longer but can be used (in case it is clear enough to be spread on the ground). -Sanna |
Transportation costs of waste
Anne
Discussion on ...
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
The web pages of SYKE and local Environmental authorities' lists do not have a plan of MSWI in Tampere. Tampere was not mentioned in lists of Ongoing environmental impact assesments (Vireillä olevat YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7494&lan=fi) and finished environmental impact assesments (Päättyneet YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7495&lan=fi) or list of environmental permits of Western Finland Environmental Permit Authority 2004-2006 (http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7613&lan=fi) and Pirkanmaa Regional Environmental Centre 2002-2006 (http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=8321&lan=fi)
|
Health effects of dioxins and PM2.5
Anu T
Discussion on short term effects of dioxins
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--Short term effects of dioxins only occur when the acute doses exceed the current background exposures by several orders of magnitude. This kind of exposures are not possible in the case of MSWI, and they can be excluded.: . --Jouni 10:33, 21 September 2006 (EEST), Anu {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|