Talk:Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Indicators: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Discussion on ...: no plans in Tampere)
Line 38: Line 38:
|Statement    = There are no plans to build MSWI in Tampere.
|Statement    = There are no plans to build MSWI in Tampere.
|Outcome      =  
|Outcome      =  
|Argumentation = The web pages of SYKE and local Environmental authorities' lists do not have a plan of MSWI in Tampere.
|Argumentation = The web pages of SYKE and local Environmental authorities' lists do not have a plan of MSWI in Tampere. Ongoing environmental impact assesments (Vireillä olevat YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7494&lan=fi) and finished environmental impact assesments (Päättyneet YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7495&lan=fi), Environmental permits 2004, 2005 and 2006 at http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7613&lan=fi
}}
}}


Revision as of 11:22, 28 September 2006

  • Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case
  • Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö

Well-being of the population (smells, comfort, noise)

Kari Auri

Discussion on well-being indicators

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Effects on economy (esp. gas energy plant)

Juha

Discussion on effect on economy

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Probably it could be possible to use also ash produced by MSWI? In Elimäki new factory was started where they produce forest fertilizer from the ash, which means that ash is not waste any longer but can be used (in case it is clear enough to be spread on the ground). -Sanna

←--indirect effects on economy: increasing employment rate affect on births?; values of property will decrease/stay the same level? Environment preserving view of MSWI may increase the economical state of the Hämeenkyrö (link to the public opionion and welfare indicators), etc.--Auri Koivuhuhta 13:38, 22 September 2006 (EEST): . {{{2}}} {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Transportation costs of waste

Anne

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
The web pages of SYKE and local Environmental authorities' lists do not have a plan of MSWI in Tampere. Ongoing environmental impact assesments (Vireillä olevat YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7494&lan=fi) and finished environmental impact assesments (Päättyneet YVA-hankkeet http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7495&lan=fi), Environmental permits 2004, 2005 and 2006 at http://www.ymparisto.fi/default.asp?node=7613&lan=fi

Health effects of dioxins and PM2.5

Anu T

Discussion on short term effects of dioxins

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
←--Short term effects of dioxins only occur when the acute doses exceed the current background exposures by several orders of magnitude. This kind of exposures are not possible in the case of MSWI, and they can be excluded.: . --Jouni 10:33, 21 September 2006 (EEST), Anu {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=Talk:Hämeenkyrö_MSWI_risk_assessment:_Indicators&oldid=1921"