Decision analysis and risk management: Difference between revisions
m (→Content) |
(course structure improved) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{| {{prettytable}} | {| {{prettytable}} | ||
|+ '''Schedule and contents of the course.''' <br>Changes are likely especially in the content, but the dates presented here are more or less fixed. | |+ '''Schedule and contents of the course.''' <br>Each row is a three-hour block of lectures, exercises, discussions, or organised group work, in total 69 hours of teaching. In addition, self-organised group work and individual learning is expected to take ca. 100 hours. <br>Changes are likely especially in the content, but the dates presented here are more or less fixed. | ||
! Date | ! Date | ||
! Lecturer | ! Lecturer | ||
! Theory lectures and exercises | ! Theory lectures and exercises | ||
Line 31: | Line 30: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 28.2. AM (10-13) | | 28.2. AM (10-13) | ||
| Jouni, Mikko | | Jouni, Mikko | ||
| '''Practical introduction to course.''' | | '''Practical introduction to course.''' | ||
Line 37: | Line 35: | ||
* Content and teaching/study methods. | * Content and teaching/study methods. | ||
| '''Introduction to the case study and exercises''' | | '''Introduction to the case study and exercises''' | ||
* swine flu vaccination campaign in Finland: effects and side effects? | * swine flu vaccination campaign in Finland 2009-2011: effects and side effects? | ||
* group work: decision analysis study plan | * group work: decision analysis study plan | ||
* individual work: reflections on risk management options and actions | * individual work: reflections on risk management options and actions | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 3.3. AM | | 3.3. AM | ||
| Jouni, Mikko, Marko | | Jouni, Mikko, Marko | ||
| '''Introduction to Risk management''' | | '''Introduction to Risk management'''. What is managed, who is responsible, what is included? Traditional paradigm. | ||
* Look from decision-maker's point of view: needs, communication, and assessment all included. | * Look from decision-maker's point of view: needs, communication, and assessment all included. | ||
* Openness: RA, RM, RC are not totally separate. | * Openness: RA, RM, RC are not totally separate. | ||
Line 53: | Line 50: | ||
| '''Beginning of the swine flu story:''' How the swine flu problem emerged (spring 2009) and spread in the world. | | '''Beginning of the swine flu story:''' How the swine flu problem emerged (spring 2009) and spread in the world. | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| | | 3.3. PM | ||
| | | Jouni, Mikko, Marko | ||
| '''Introduction to Risk management''' (cont'd). | |||
| '''Beginning of the swine flu story:''' (cont'd). | |||
|---- | |||
| 4.3. AM | |||
| Jouni, Mikko, Marko | | Jouni, Mikko, Marko | ||
| '''Opasnet training''' | | '''Opasnet training''' | ||
Line 65: | Line 66: | ||
* Should we launch a vaccination campaign? | * Should we launch a vaccination campaign? | ||
* Should I take vaccination? Should I not take vaccination? | * Should I take vaccination? Should I not take vaccination? | ||
|---- | |||
'''Exercise part one begins:''' make a decision analysis study plan to find out good policies in this case. Which models to use, what to assess? | | 4.3. PM | ||
| Jouni, Mikko, Marko | |||
| '''Opasnet training''' (cont'd) | |||
| '''Exercise part one begins:''' make a decision analysis study plan to find out good policies in this case. Which models to use, what to assess? | |||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 8.3. AM | | 8.3. AM | ||
| Jouni | | Jouni | ||
| '''Decision analysis: introduction''' | | '''[[Decision analysis]]: introduction''' | ||
* Purpose of assessment: Why it is done | * Purpose of assessment: Why it is done | ||
* Concepts: decisions, objectives, optimization, uncertainty, decision trees | * Concepts: decisions, objectives, optimization, uncertainty, decision trees | ||
'''Subjective | '''[[Subjective probability]]''' | ||
* Practical exercise | * Practical exercise | ||
* Bayesian rule and Bayesian networks | * Bayesian rule and Bayesian networks | ||
* Denis Lindley: Philosophy of statistics | * Denis Lindley: Philosophy of statistics | ||
* Importance of exhaustiveness (coverage) | |||
| | | | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 9.3. AM or PM | | 9.3. AM or PM | ||
| Jouni | | Jouni | ||
| '''Decision analysis (continued)'''. | | '''Decision analysis (continued)'''. | ||
Line 88: | Line 91: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 10.3. AM or PM | | 10.3. AM or PM | ||
| Jouni | | Jouni | ||
| '''Bayesian updating ''' | | '''[[Bayesian updating]]''' | ||
| '''Swine flu story''' (autumn - winter 2009): First deaths of swine flu (threat was real). Problems with implementation: long queues in health centers. Clear-cut case falls apart. False alarm? Disease was milder than thought. | | '''Swine flu story''' (autumn - winter 2009): First deaths of swine flu (threat was real). Problems with implementation: long queues in health centers. Clear-cut case falls apart. False alarm? Disease was milder than thought. | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 11.3. AM | | 11.3. AM | ||
| Jouni | | Jouni | ||
| '''Calculation exercise of Bayes''' | | '''Calculation exercise of Bayes''' | ||
Line 100: | Line 101: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 16.3. AM | | 16.3. AM | ||
| Marko | | Marko | ||
| '''Monte Carlo modeling''' | | '''Monte Carlo modeling''' | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 17.3. PM | | 17.3. PM | ||
| Marko | | Marko | ||
| '''Calculation exercise'''. Connections to use of knowledge. | | '''Calculation exercise'''. Connections to use of knowledge. | ||
Line 112: | Line 111: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 18.3. PM | | 18.3. PM | ||
| Jouni | | Jouni | ||
| '''Overall view of different models''': [[Producing result from rationale]]. | | '''Overall view of different models''': [[Producing result from rationale]]. | ||
* Deterministic, heuristic, and probabilistic estimates. | |||
* Functional, differential, logical, and probabilistic relations. | |||
* Other relations (neural networks). | |||
| '''First drafts of DA study plans.''' Brief presentations of and discussions about DA study plan drafts. | | '''First drafts of DA study plans.''' Brief presentations of and discussions about DA study plan drafts. | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 21.3. AM | | 21.3. AM | ||
| Jouni | | Jouni | ||
| '''Decision making under uncertainty''' | | '''Decision making under uncertainty''' | ||
* Assessment performance? Quality of evidence? Impacts of uncertainty in decision-making. Hindsight. | * Assessment performance? Quality of evidence? Impacts of uncertainty in decision-making. Hindsight. | ||
* Acceptability | * Acceptability | ||
* Value of information | * Value of information | ||
* Analysis of model inputs, outputs, and structure | * Analysis of model inputs, outputs, and structure | ||
| | | Use of adjuvants. How similar is the same? Can/Should be aim at zero risk? Benefit-risk comparisons. | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 22.3. AM or PM | | 22.3. AM or PM | ||
| Jouni, Marko | | Jouni, Marko | ||
| '''Decision-making under uncertainty (continued)'''. [[Value of information]]. | | '''Decision-making under uncertainty (continued)'''. [[Value of information]], [[Value of information analysis]]. | ||
| | | | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 25.3. AM or PM | | 25.3. AM or PM | ||
| Marko | | Marko | ||
| VOI calculation exercise. | | '''VOI calculation exercise. ''' | ||
| | | | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 29.3. AM or PM | | 29.3. AM or PM | ||
| Jouni, Mikko | | Jouni, Mikko | ||
| | | | ||
Line 151: | Line 147: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 30.3. AM or PM | | 30.3. AM or PM | ||
| Mikko, Jouni | |||
| Mikko | |||
| '''[[Trialogue]], collective learning | | '''[[Trialogue]], collective learning | ||
* [[:en:Justified true belief|Justified true belief]] and its problems | * [[:en:Justified true belief|Justified true belief]] and its problems | ||
Line 165: | Line 160: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 31.3. AM or PM | | 31.3. AM or PM | ||
| Jouni, Mikko | | Jouni, Mikko | ||
| '''[[Inference rules]]. [[Scientific method]]''' as open discussion. [[Falsification]]. | | '''[[Inference rules]]. [[Scientific method]]''' as open discussion. [[Falsification]]. | ||
Line 173: | Line 167: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 1.4. AM or PM | | 1.4. AM or PM | ||
| Jouni, Mikko | | Jouni, Mikko | ||
| '''[[Discussion]]''': Lectures of concepts | | '''[[Discussion]]''': Lectures of concepts | ||
Line 190: | Line 177: | ||
* Build a structured discussion out of this in groups. | * Build a structured discussion out of this in groups. | ||
* Possibly utilise group writing tools? | * Possibly utilise group writing tools? | ||
| ''' | | | ||
|---- | |||
| 7.4. PM | |||
| Mikko | |||
| '''Risk management''' (theory). What is managed, who is responsible, what is included? Traditional paradigm. | |||
* Look from decision-maker's point of view: needs, communication, and assessment all included. | |||
* Openness: RA, RM, RC are not totally separate. | |||
* Performance: Context about what we actually aim to achieve. How do we know if we succeeded? | |||
* Developing risk management options. | |||
* Development of risk assessment questions. | |||
* Science-policy interface. Why it does not exist. | |||
| | |||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 8.4. AM or PM | | 8.4. AM or PM | ||
| | | Mikko | ||
| | | | ||
| '''Swine flu story (autumn 2010)''': Vaccination campaign halted. THL remains silent about possible risks. Narcolepsy analysis. Impacts of openness. How methods learned should be applied now? Why openness is needed? | |||
'''Swine flu story (January 2011):''' Publishing of narcolepsy results and apologies. Searching for the guilty. | |||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 11.4. AM | | 11.4. AM | ||
| Jouni, Mikko | | Jouni, Mikko | ||
| | | | ||
| | | '''Final seminar:''' Presentations (exercise parts one and two), discussions, and summary of perspectives to the case. | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
| 12.4. AM | | 12.4. AM | ||
| Jouni, Mikko | | Jouni, Mikko | ||
| '''Wrap-up and course feedback.''' | | '''Wrap-up and course feedback.''' | ||
| '''Final seminar | | '''Final seminar''' (cont'd). | ||
|} | |} | ||
For | |||
'''For the case study description, see {{disclink|Case study exercise (draft)}}. | |||
Line 249: | Line 229: | ||
* Web-Based Learning 30 % | * Web-Based Learning 30 % | ||
;Additional Information on Teaching / Learning Methods: | ;Additional Information on Teaching / Learning Methods: Self-organised group work requires on-line computers. | ||
;Teaching Languages: English | ;Teaching Languages: English | ||
;Additional Information on Languages | ;Additional Information on Languages | ||
Line 256: | Line 236: | ||
===ASSESSMENT=== | ===ASSESSMENT=== | ||
;Assessment is Based on: | ;Assessment is Based on: | ||
* | * Participation in lectures and discussions. | ||
* | * Case study decision analysis plan in groups. | ||
;Additional Information: The | * Case study risk management plan individually. | ||
;Additional Information: The case studies will be evaluated based on contributions in Opasnet. | |||
;Assessment: 0 (Fail) – 5 (Excellent) | ;Assessment: 0 (Fail) – 5 (Excellent) | ||
Line 380: | Line 361: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Related further education courses == | == Related further education courses (in Finnish, organised in Kuopio) == | ||
Täydennyskoulutuskursseja DARM-kurssin aiheista järjestetään osana ERACedu-riskinarviointikoulutusta. Koulutus järjestetään yksipäiväisinä koulutuksina Kuopiossa. Koulutuksessa voi osallistua yhteen tai useampaan päivään; muiden osien käyminen ei ole välttämätöntä, mutta samassa kuussa järjestettävät koulutukset ovat aihepiiriltään lähellä toisiaan. | |||
# "Mini-DARM" (5 | # "Mini-DARM" (5.5.2011) | ||
#* | #* Sikainfluenssatapauksen pohjalta toteutettu johdanto päätösanalyysiin ja riskinhallinnan perusteisiin. | ||
# | # Päätöksenteko epävarmuuden oloissa (19.5.2011) | ||
#* | #* Päätösanalyysi ja -mallitus | ||
# | # Keskustelu ja kansalaiskuuleminen päätöksenteossa: menetelmiä ja työkaluja (8.9.2011) | ||
#* | #* Kuinka järjestetään tehokkaasti kansalaiskuulemisia ja avointa osallistumista päätöksentekoon tai vaikutusarviointeihin? | ||
# | # Yhteisöllinen oppiminen (29.9.2011) | ||
#* | #* Osallistava arviointi ja mallitus. | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 21:23, 8 February 2011
This page is a lecture.
The page identifier is Op_en3047 |
---|
Moderator:Jouni (see all) |
|
Upload data
|
Decision analysis and risk management is a university course [1] for Master's Degree Programme in General Toxicology and Environmental Health Risk Assessment ToxEn.
Scope
What is such a good course content about decision analysis and risk management that
- it gives a good overview of modern assessment methods,
- is not overlapping with other courses in the MSc program,
- utilises modern web workspaces for learning,
Result
- Name
- Decision analysis and risk management
- ECTS-credits
- 6
- Abbreviation
- DARM
Content
Date | Lecturer | Theory lectures and exercises | Case study discussions and exercises |
---|---|---|---|
28.2. AM (10-13) | Jouni, Mikko | Practical introduction to course.
|
Introduction to the case study and exercises
|
3.3. AM | Jouni, Mikko, Marko | Introduction to Risk management. What is managed, who is responsible, what is included? Traditional paradigm.
|
Beginning of the swine flu story: How the swine flu problem emerged (spring 2009) and spread in the world. |
3.3. PM | Jouni, Mikko, Marko | Introduction to Risk management (cont'd). | Beginning of the swine flu story: (cont'd). |
4.3. AM | Jouni, Mikko, Marko | Opasnet training
|
Swine flu story (summer 2009): Preparedness in Finland and internationally. Vaccination campaigns, counter-campaigns.
|
4.3. PM | Jouni, Mikko, Marko | Opasnet training (cont'd) | Exercise part one begins: make a decision analysis study plan to find out good policies in this case. Which models to use, what to assess? |
8.3. AM | Jouni | Decision analysis: introduction
|
|
9.3. AM or PM | Jouni | Decision analysis (continued). | Swine flu case as a decision problem: what are the relevant decisions, outcomes and questions in the case? |
10.3. AM or PM | Jouni | Bayesian updating | Swine flu story (autumn - winter 2009): First deaths of swine flu (threat was real). Problems with implementation: long queues in health centers. Clear-cut case falls apart. False alarm? Disease was milder than thought. |
11.3. AM | Jouni | Calculation exercise of Bayes | |
16.3. AM | Marko | Monte Carlo modeling | |
17.3. PM | Marko | Calculation exercise. Connections to use of knowledge. | |
18.3. PM | Jouni | Overall view of different models: Producing result from rationale.
|
First drafts of DA study plans. Brief presentations of and discussions about DA study plan drafts. |
21.3. AM | Jouni | Decision making under uncertainty
|
Use of adjuvants. How similar is the same? Can/Should be aim at zero risk? Benefit-risk comparisons. |
22.3. AM or PM | Jouni, Marko | Decision-making under uncertainty (continued). Value of information, Value of information analysis. | |
25.3. AM or PM | Marko | VOI calculation exercise. | |
29.3. AM or PM | Jouni, Mikko | Full drafts of DA study plans. Presentations of and discussions about study plans. Apply the model to assess the case based on your own research plan. Defend your plan in plenary.
| |
30.3. AM or PM | Mikko, Jouni | Trialogue, collective learning
|
Swine flu story: Secret connections to drug industry? Narcolepsy.
Exercise part two begins: Risk management actions and options. |
31.3. AM or PM | Jouni, Mikko | Inference rules. Scientific method as open discussion. Falsification.
Opasnet and other web tools for risk assessment. |
|
1.4. AM or PM | Jouni, Mikko | Discussion: Lectures of concepts
Structuring of discussions in practice and theory
|
|
7.4. PM | Mikko | Risk management (theory). What is managed, who is responsible, what is included? Traditional paradigm.
|
|
8.4. AM or PM | Mikko | Swine flu story (autumn 2010): Vaccination campaign halted. THL remains silent about possible risks. Narcolepsy analysis. Impacts of openness. How methods learned should be applied now? Why openness is needed?
Swine flu story (January 2011): Publishing of narcolepsy results and apologies. Searching for the guilty. | |
11.4. AM | Jouni, Mikko | Final seminar: Presentations (exercise parts one and two), discussions, and summary of perspectives to the case. | |
12.4. AM | Jouni, Mikko | Wrap-up and course feedback. | Final seminar (cont'd). |
For the case study description, see D↷.
- Learning outcomes
- The student will learn about the fundaments of decision analysis; and the connections between societal decision-making and risk assessment. He is able to apply the scientific method and falsification in the context of risk assessment. He also knows how to build an assessment based on the requirements of risk management.
- Learning material
- Online course readings in Opasnet: http://en.opasnet.org
- Degree Programme(s)
- ToxEn, Environment health risk assessment
Implementation
- Time
- Spring 2011
Teaching / Learning Methods
- Lectures 36 h
- Tutorial 0 h
- One-to-One Teaching 0 h
- Group Work 30 h
- Independent Study 96 h
- Web-Based Learning 30 %
- Additional Information on Teaching / Learning Methods
- Self-organised group work requires on-line computers.
- Teaching Languages
- English
- Additional Information on Languages
- Offered for Students in Other Universities (JOO-opintoja)
- YES
ASSESSMENT
- Assessment is Based on
- Participation in lectures and discussions.
- Case study decision analysis plan in groups.
- Case study risk management plan individually.
- Additional Information
- The case studies will be evaluated based on contributions in Opasnet.
- Assessment
- 0 (Fail) – 5 (Excellent)
- Additional Information
- Prerequisites
Contacts
- Organising Departments
- Department of environmental science (in collaboration with the National Institute for Health and Welfare)
- Course Director
- Jukka Juutilainen
- Teachers
- Jouni Tuomisto, Mikko Pohjola, Marko Tainio
- Contact Persons
- mikko.pohjola(at)thl.fi
- Registration for the Course
- Wossikka
Further information
- Keywords
- Risk assessment, decision analysis, Bayesian theory, open assessment, risk management, societal decision making.
- Further Information
Rationale
Background information from other available Risk assessment study programs are provided here: Decision analysis and risk management - background information
Other relevant courses than may have supporting, similar, or overlapping content.
- Environmental Health for International Students, 5 op
- Toxicological and Environmental Risk Assessment and Risk Communication, 3 op
- Advanced Toxicological Risk Assessment, 9 op Note! Group meetings 24.02.11 to 10.00-12.00, 17.03.11 to 13.00-15.00
- Decision analysis and risk management, 6 op This course!
- Ecotoxicology and Risk Assessment, 4 op
- Environmental health risk assessment, 4 op
- The course Ympäristöterveys is openly available under Aducate.
See also discussions about the course content. D↷
See also
- Course contents in UEF website
- Ympäristöterveys-kurssi Avoimessa yliopistossa (Environmental health course in the Open University; in Finnish)
- Course material (in Finnish)
- Monimediainen oppimisympäristö ympäristöterveydestä
- Keeney (2006): Decision Science programs in the USA
Related further education courses (in Finnish, organised in Kuopio)
Täydennyskoulutuskursseja DARM-kurssin aiheista järjestetään osana ERACedu-riskinarviointikoulutusta. Koulutus järjestetään yksipäiväisinä koulutuksina Kuopiossa. Koulutuksessa voi osallistua yhteen tai useampaan päivään; muiden osien käyminen ei ole välttämätöntä, mutta samassa kuussa järjestettävät koulutukset ovat aihepiiriltään lähellä toisiaan.
- "Mini-DARM" (5.5.2011)
- Sikainfluenssatapauksen pohjalta toteutettu johdanto päätösanalyysiin ja riskinhallinnan perusteisiin.
- Päätöksenteko epävarmuuden oloissa (19.5.2011)
- Päätösanalyysi ja -mallitus
- Keskustelu ja kansalaiskuuleminen päätöksenteossa: menetelmiä ja työkaluja (8.9.2011)
- Kuinka järjestetään tehokkaasti kansalaiskuulemisia ja avointa osallistumista päätöksentekoon tai vaikutusarviointeihin?
- Yhteisöllinen oppiminen (29.9.2011)
- Osallistava arviointi ja mallitus.
References
Related files
<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>