Risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipal solid waste incinerator: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 254: Line 254:
|Scope      = 10 - 20 years?
|Scope      = 10 - 20 years?
|Description =  
|Description =  
|Inputs      = List:
How new municipal solid waste incinerator affects to economy? Waste incinerator is going to be a quite significant employer in Hämeenkyrö. It is also noted that price of gas energy is rising so it might be necessary to build the waste incinerator to guarantee low priced energy for M-real cardboard factory and Finnforest sawmill. Shutdown of either of these factory could be devastating to Hämeenkyrö's economy (employs over 300 persons). Shutdown of gas energy plant is not crucial (employs only 24 people).
# Persons employed by gas energy plant (24 person)
|Inputs      = Data
# Persons employed at the starting phase in the municipal solid waste incinerator (50 - 60 person-year)
* Persons employed
# Persons employed at working phase of municipal solid waste incinerator (60 - 70 persons)
** gas energy plant (24 person)
# Persons employed by M-Real cardboard factory (335)
** starting phase of the municipal solid waste incinerator (50 - 60 person-year)
# Persons employed by Finnforest Sawmill  
** working phase of municipal solid waste incinerator (60 - 70 persons)
# Tax incomes
** M-Real cardboard factory (335 persons)
** Finnforest Sawmill (? persons)
* Tax incomes
** directly to Hämeenkyrö
** directly to Pirkanmaa
** indirect taxes (Sawmill, cardboard factory and waste incinerator)
 
|Index      =  
|Index      =  
|Definition  =  
|Definition  =  
|Unit        = € or employed persons
|Unit        = € or employed persons
|Result      =  
|Result      = Worst-case scenario:
* No waste incinerator or bioplant, shutdown of both factories and gas plant
** Over 300 person '''less''' are employed
Best-case scenario:
* Waste incinerator is builded, both factories and gas plant remains
** over 70 persons '''more''' are employed
OK-case scenario:
* Waste incinerator is builded, both factories remains, gas plant is shut down
** about 50 persons '''more''' are employed
|References  =  
|References  =  
}}
}}

Revision as of 12:26, 20 September 2006

Risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipal solid waste incinerator contains a structured risk assessment of a plan to build a MSWI in Hämeenkyrö. There will be a public vote related to a city planning decision: whether the municipality should plan an area for the plant or not. The vote will be held in November 19, 2006.

Objective

Empty variable template


General variables

  1. Precautionary principle (disagreement)
    1. PP based on expected value, general
    2. PP based on worst-case or another 'conservative' scenario, general
    3. PP applied to emissions of municipal solid wasti incinerator (MSWI) in Hämeenkyrö
  2. Intake fraction (disambiguation)
    1. iF based on measured concentration fields
    2. iF based on exposure monitoring
    3. iF based on shortcuts

Fine particle variables

PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö

Päivi

PM2.5 emissions from MSWI, biofuel plant, and natural gas plant in Hämeenkyrö

Tommi

Baseline PM2.5 exposure in Hämeenkyrö

Anne K

PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö

Terhi Y

PM2.5 exposure-response function on population level

Sari

Dioxin variables

Dioxin emissions in Hämeenkyrö

Virpi

Baseline dioxin exposure in Hämeenkyrö

Marjo

Dioxin exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö

Martin

Dioxin exposure-response function on population level

Sanna

Indicator variables

  • Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case
  • Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö

Well-being of the population (smells, comfort, noise)

Kari Auri

Effects on economy (esp. gas energy plant)

Juha

Transportation costs of waste

Anne

Health effects of dioxins and PM2.5

Anu T

Miscellaneous variables

  • Secondary effects on waste separation, recycling etc.)


Municipal solid waste production in Häme

Pasi K

Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland

Marjaleena

Background of waste production and its relations to EU directive

Eva