Risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipal solid waste incinerator: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 254: | Line 254: | ||
|Scope = 10 - 20 years? | |Scope = 10 - 20 years? | ||
|Description = | |Description = | ||
|Inputs = | How new municipal solid waste incinerator affects to economy? Waste incinerator is going to be a quite significant employer in Hämeenkyrö. It is also noted that price of gas energy is rising so it might be necessary to build the waste incinerator to guarantee low priced energy for M-real cardboard factory and Finnforest sawmill. Shutdown of either of these factory could be devastating to Hämeenkyrö's economy (employs over 300 persons). Shutdown of gas energy plant is not crucial (employs only 24 people). | ||
|Inputs = Data | |||
* Persons employed | |||
** gas energy plant (24 person) | |||
** starting phase of the municipal solid waste incinerator (50 - 60 person-year) | |||
** working phase of municipal solid waste incinerator (60 - 70 persons) | |||
** M-Real cardboard factory (335 persons) | |||
** Finnforest Sawmill (? persons) | |||
* Tax incomes | |||
** directly to Hämeenkyrö | |||
** directly to Pirkanmaa | |||
** indirect taxes (Sawmill, cardboard factory and waste incinerator) | |||
|Index = | |Index = | ||
|Definition = | |Definition = | ||
|Unit = € or employed persons | |Unit = € or employed persons | ||
|Result = | |Result = Worst-case scenario: | ||
* No waste incinerator or bioplant, shutdown of both factories and gas plant | |||
** Over 300 person '''less''' are employed | |||
Best-case scenario: | |||
* Waste incinerator is builded, both factories and gas plant remains | |||
** over 70 persons '''more''' are employed | |||
OK-case scenario: | |||
* Waste incinerator is builded, both factories remains, gas plant is shut down | |||
** about 50 persons '''more''' are employed | |||
|References = | |References = | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 12:26, 20 September 2006
Risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipal solid waste incinerator contains a structured risk assessment of a plan to build a MSWI in Hämeenkyrö. There will be a public vote related to a city planning decision: whether the municipality should plan an area for the plant or not. The vote will be held in November 19, 2006.
Objective
RA of Hämeenkyrö MSWI
Empty variable template
General variables
Optimizing rules
- Precautionary principle (disagreement)
- PP based on expected value, general
- PP based on worst-case or another 'conservative' scenario, general
- PP applied to emissions of municipal solid wasti incinerator (MSWI) in Hämeenkyrö
- Intake fraction (disambiguation)
- iF based on measured concentration fields
- iF based on exposure monitoring
- iF based on shortcuts
Fine particle variables
PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö
Päivi
PM2.5 emissions from MSWI, biofuel plant, and natural gas plant in Hämeenkyrö
Tommi
Baseline PM2.5 exposure in Hämeenkyrö
Anne K
PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö
Terhi Y
PM2.5 exposure-response function on population level
Sari
Dioxin variables
Dioxin emissions in Hämeenkyrö
Virpi
Baseline dioxin exposure in Hämeenkyrö
Marjo
Dioxin exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö
Martin
Dioxin exposure-response function on population level
Sanna
Indicator variables
- Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case
- Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö
Well-being of the population (smells, comfort, noise)
Kari Auri
Effects on economy (esp. gas energy plant)
Juha
Effects on economy
Transportation costs of waste
Anne
Health effects of dioxins and PM2.5
Anu T
Miscellaneous variables
- Secondary effects on waste separation, recycling etc.)
Municipal solid waste production in Häme
Pasi K
Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland
Marjaleena
Background of waste production and its relations to EU directive
Eva