Template:Discussion: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(statement and resolution added as parts)
(updated to reflect the new parameters better)
Line 1: Line 1:
{|border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" rules="all" style="margin:1em 1em 1em 0; border:solid 1px #AAAAAA; border-collapse:collapse;background-color:#F9F9F9; empty-cells:show;"
{|border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" rules="all" style="margin:1em 1em 1em 0; border:solid 1px #AAAAAA; border-collapse:collapse;background-color:#F9F9F9; empty-cells:show;"
|'''Statements:''' {{{Dispute|}}}{{{Statements|}}}<br>
|'''Statements:''' {{{Dispute|}}}{{{Statements|}}}<br>
'''Resolution:''' {{#if:{{{Outcome|}}}|'''{{{Outcome}}}'''|[[category:Open discussions]]}}
'''Resolution:''' {{#if:{{{Resolution|}}}|'''{{{Resolution}}}'''[[Category:Closed discussions]]|Resolution not yet found.[[category:Open discussions]]}}
{{{Resolution|}}}
{{{Outcome|}}}
|----
|----
|'''Argumentation:'''  
|'''Argumentation:'''  
Line 8: Line 8:
{{{Argumentation|}}}
{{{Argumentation|}}}
|}
|}
<noinclude>The template is in transition phase. The '''Dispute''' is now called '''Statements''' and '''Outcome''' is called '''Resolution'''. All of these are valid arguments for the template to prevent problems. However, a problem remains: If BOTH Outcome and Resolutions are missing, then the text should say: "Resolution not yet found", and then it should be categorised to [[:Category:Open discussions]]. Now this does not work optimally.</noinclude>
<noinclude>The template is in transition phase. The '''Dispute''' is now called '''Statements''' and '''Outcome''' is called '''Resolution'''. All of these are valid arguments for the template to prevent problems. The discussions have now rather systematically been updated so that they only contain Statements and Resolution, so these should be used as the main parameters. If Resolution is missing, then the text should say: "Resolution not yet found", and then it is categorised to [[:Category:Open discussions]].
 
{{attack|1|I have doubts about Resolution being better than Outcome. Do we want to separate between closed discussions (dispute not resolved, but the current outcome is included in the information object); and resolved discussions (only one statement is valid after the discussion)? We must think about this. (|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 07:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)}}</noinclude>

Revision as of 07:18, 22 November 2009

Statements:

Resolution: Resolution not yet found.

Argumentation:


The template is in transition phase. The Dispute is now called Statements and Outcome is called Resolution. All of these are valid arguments for the template to prevent problems. The discussions have now rather systematically been updated so that they only contain Statements and Resolution, so these should be used as the main parameters. If Resolution is missing, then the text should say: "Resolution not yet found", and then it is categorised to Category:Open discussions.

⇤--1: . I have doubts about Resolution being better than Outcome. Do we want to separate between closed discussions (dispute not resolved, but the current outcome is included in the information object); and resolved discussions (only one statement is valid after the discussion)? We must think about this. ( --Jouni 07:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)