Kuopio workshop report: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Image: | [[Image:Noise sleepdisturbance Schiphol assessment.jpg]] | ||
The noise policy case in the Schiphol assessment (see figure) tests and applies the selected Intarese methods and tools [[Tools needed in Intarese toolbox|(see table)]]. We start with the green and yellow variables, since there are data available. For each variable we describe the methods and tools needed and give an example/application of available methods and tools in the noise policy case. | |||
The noise policy case in the Schiphol assessment (see figure) tests and applies the Intarese methods and tools [[Tools needed in Intarese toolbox|(see table)]]. We start with the green and yellow variables, since there are data available. | |||
===Noise levels: Application in noise policy case=== | ===Noise levels: Application in noise policy case=== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
''Meta-analysis of noise level data in Schiphol surrounding area'' | ''Meta-analysis of noise level data in Schiphol surrounding area'' | ||
Methods and tools available: | |||
*WP1.3 meta analysis guidance | |||
**Application in case: | |||
**Input to method: | |||
**Output of method: | |||
===Noise exposure to certain noise levels: Application in noise policy case=== | |||
Original variable: [[Noise exposure|Noise exposure]] | |||
'''Methods and tools needed''' | |||
''Noise exposure model'' | |||
Methods and tools available: | |||
*WP1.2 exposure models | |||
**Application in case: | |||
**Input to method: | |||
**Output of method: | |||
''Development of noise exposure indicator'' | |||
Methods and tools available: | |||
*WHO indicator development methodology | |||
**Application in case: | |||
**Input to method: | |||
**Output of method: Noise exposure indicator | |||
''Meta-analysis of noise exposure data in Schiphol surrounding area'' | |||
Methods and tools available: | Methods and tools available: | ||
Revision as of 11:34, 16 March 2007
The report about the workshop, including outcomes, experiences, lessons learned, problems faced, development needs identified etc., will be written here. An intermediate report will be prepared for presentation at the SP1 meeting on 20 March and the final report will be prepared in the end of the workshop and presented at SP4 workshop in April.
Testing of Intarese methods and tools in noise policy case
File:Noise sleepdisturbance Schiphol assessment.jpg
The noise policy case in the Schiphol assessment (see figure) tests and applies the selected Intarese methods and tools (see table). We start with the green and yellow variables, since there are data available. For each variable we describe the methods and tools needed and give an example/application of available methods and tools in the noise policy case.
Noise levels: Application in noise policy case
Original variable: Noise levels
Methods and tools needed
Development of noise level indicator
Methods and tools available:
- WHO indicator development methodology
- Application in case:
- Input to method:
- Output of method: Noise level indicator
Meta-analysis of noise level data in Schiphol surrounding area
Methods and tools available:
- WP1.3 meta analysis guidance
- Application in case:
- Input to method:
- Output of method:
Noise exposure to certain noise levels: Application in noise policy case
Original variable: Noise exposure
Methods and tools needed
Noise exposure model
Methods and tools available:
- WP1.2 exposure models
- Application in case:
- Input to method:
- Output of method:
Development of noise exposure indicator
Methods and tools available:
- WHO indicator development methodology
- Application in case:
- Input to method:
- Output of method: Noise exposure indicator
Meta-analysis of noise exposure data in Schiphol surrounding area
Methods and tools available:
- WP1.3 meta analysis guidance
- Application in case:
- Input to method:
- Output of method: