New thoughts and discussions: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This page is intended for sharing your latest Intarese related thoughts and discussion topics that are already worth disseminating among interested people, but that might not necessarily deserve their own page yet.
This page is intended for sharing your latest Intarese related thoughts and discussion topics that are already worth disseminating among interested people, but that might not be ripe enough to deserve their own pages yet.


==1.6.2006 On the nature of Intarese toolbox==
==1.6.2006 Some words about argumentation theory and Intarese toolbox==
 
Participants: Jouni&Mikko
 
- the role of argumentation theory in risk assessment is to fill the gap between explicit modelling/calculation and unstructured discussion.
: -

Revision as of 11:02, 1 June 2006

This page is intended for sharing your latest Intarese related thoughts and discussion topics that are already worth disseminating among interested people, but that might not be ripe enough to deserve their own pages yet.

1.6.2006 Some words about argumentation theory and Intarese toolbox

Participants: Jouni&Mikko

- the role of argumentation theory in risk assessment is to fill the gap between explicit modelling/calculation and unstructured discussion.

-