Climate change policy assessment: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Conclusions: see also added with link to UNFCCC)
(common boundaries - ideas added)
Line 17: Line 17:


===Purpose===
===Purpose===
A tentative research question:


What are the impacts of climate change mitigation in Europe?  
A tentative research questions:{{disclink|Who should find out alternative questions?}}
* What are the impacts of climate change in Europe?
* What are the impacts of climate change mitigation in Europe?  


===Boundaries===
===Boundaries===
* Population in Europe
* Time 2008-2050
* Climate patterns in the future based on [[IPCC]] results and predictions.
*


===Scenarios===
===Scenarios===
Line 76: Line 82:
*** raw water scarcity leads to the use of microbially lower-quality raw water.
*** raw water scarcity leads to the use of microbially lower-quality raw water.
* Something about agriculture, land use change and the impacts connected to those.
* Something about agriculture, land use change and the impacts connected to those.
==== Ideas about common issues====
'''WP3.1 Transport
* Topic is to study environmentally friendly zones (limiting car driving) or congestion charge zones within cities.
* Case cities are Rome, London, the Hague, Helsinki, Barcelona
* Impacts: PM2.5 and health; greenhouse gas emissions, traffic noise and health and annoyance.
* Shared variables (possibly)
** PM2.5 emission
** PM2.5 exposure
** PM2.5 [[:op_en:ERF|ERF]]
** CO2 emission
* Shared frameworks:
** City-level assessment
'''WP3.4 Drinking water
* Topic is to study health impacts of As (cancer) and trihalomethanes (THM; cancer, birth defects) in drinking water.
* Case countries: Spain, Finland, Hungary, Romania, United Kingdom.
* Impacts assessed:
** CC impacts on runoff and contamination of raw water
** CC impacts on availability of raw water
** Shift from bottled water to tap water as a means to reduce the ecological footprint and CC change of drinking water.
* Shared frameworks:
** City-level assessment (or rather: waterworks-level assessment)
====Common methods that are probably needed====
* Scoping tool
* DALY calculator
* ERF meta-analysis
* [[ICF]]
* GIS Web-tool
* [[Argumentation]]
* [[Analytica]]
* [[Uncertainty]] tool [[Aguila]]
* Biomarker approach





Revision as of 15:27, 24 November 2008



The meta-level research question: What is a good scope for this assessment such that

  • it relates to the impacts of climate change mitigation policies,
  • it may relate to the impacts of climate change as such,
  • the assessment covers a wide range of existing assessments within Intarese, Heimtsa, Hiwate, USTUTT, and KTL,
  • the assessment has direct policy relevance for a high-profile policy process, e.g. COP-15 (Dec 2009) or Conference of Environment and Health Ministers of Europe (early 2010?),
  • the parts of the assessment have shared parts, such as population data, future trends of climate, and/or international policies such as emission trade systems,
  • the assessment shows clear synergism in working collaboratively between its parts?

Scope

Purpose

A tentative research questions:D↷

  • What are the impacts of climate change in Europe?
  • What are the impacts of climate change mitigation in Europe?

Boundaries

  • Population in Europe
  • Time 2008-2050
  • Climate patterns in the future based on IPCC results and predictions.

Scenarios

Intended users

Participants

Definition

Variables

Learn about these other assessments and make suggestions about how that assessment could be merged into this larger assessment. Tasks are tentatively distributed to people, but you can suggest and comment on any study.

Variables that may be useful in this assessment:

Ideas about common issues

WP3.1 Transport

  • Topic is to study environmentally friendly zones (limiting car driving) or congestion charge zones within cities.
  • Case cities are Rome, London, the Hague, Helsinki, Barcelona
  • Impacts: PM2.5 and health; greenhouse gas emissions, traffic noise and health and annoyance.
  • Shared variables (possibly)
    • PM2.5 emission
    • PM2.5 exposure
    • PM2.5 ERF
    • CO2 emission
  • Shared frameworks:
    • City-level assessment


WP3.4 Drinking water

  • Topic is to study health impacts of As (cancer) and trihalomethanes (THM; cancer, birth defects) in drinking water.
  • Case countries: Spain, Finland, Hungary, Romania, United Kingdom.
  • Impacts assessed:
    • CC impacts on runoff and contamination of raw water
    • CC impacts on availability of raw water
    • Shift from bottled water to tap water as a means to reduce the ecological footprint and CC change of drinking water.
  • Shared frameworks:
    • City-level assessment (or rather: waterworks-level assessment)

Common methods that are probably needed


Pages that are not probably needed:

Analyses

Result

Results

Conclusions

See also