Information structure of Open Assessment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Results: variable attributes added) |
(TOC: flesh over titles) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
=== Background === | === Background === | ||
[[Image:Context Process and product.PNG]] | |||
* [[Open assessment]] | |||
=== Methods === | === Methods === | ||
The work is based on research questions. The current answers to these questions should be seen as hypotheses that will be tested against observations and practical experience as the work goes on. The research questions are presented in the Results section together with the current answer. | |||
The scientific methods that have been used as the foundation of this work are briefly presented here. | |||
* [[PSSP]] | |||
* [[Bayesian network]] | |||
* [[Bayes' theorem]] | |||
* [[Falsification]] | |||
* [[Decision theory]] | |||
=== Results === | === Results === | ||
* [[Universal products]]: attributes | |||
* [[Assessment]] report main attributes | |||
* [[Variable]] | |||
* [[Assessment]] report subattributes | |||
* [[Attribute]]: parts: actual content, narrative description, discussion (see [[Universal products]]) | |||
* [Discussion]] [[Dealing with disputes]]: | |||
** parts of discussion (hierarchy does NOT show temporal issues but targets of arguments) | |||
** (parts of argument?) | |||
* [[Method]] (descrbied in [[Process]]) | |||
* [[Model]], [[Tool]] (what is the difference between the two?) | |||
* [[Class]] (add this to the glossary) | |||
* Abstraction level (not written down?) | |||
* Performance, including uncertainty [[Evaluating assessment performance]], [[Assessing uncertainty]], [[Quality assurance and quality control]] | |||
=== Conclusions === | === Conclusions === | ||
Revision as of 08:43, 6 June 2008
<accesscontrol>Members of projects,,Workshop2008,,beneris,,Erac,,Heimtsa,,Hiwate,,Intarese</accesscontrol>
This is a manuscript about the information structure of Open Assessment.
Abstract
Background
Methods
The work is based on research questions. The current answers to these questions should be seen as hypotheses that will be tested against observations and practical experience as the work goes on. The research questions are presented in the Results section together with the current answer.
The scientific methods that have been used as the foundation of this work are briefly presented here.
Results
- Universal products: attributes
- Assessment report main attributes
- Variable
- Assessment report subattributes
- Attribute: parts: actual content, narrative description, discussion (see Universal products)
- [Discussion]] Dealing with disputes:
- parts of discussion (hierarchy does NOT show temporal issues but targets of arguments)
- (parts of argument?)
- Method (descrbied in Process)
- Model, Tool (what is the difference between the two?)
- Class (add this to the glossary)
- Abstraction level (not written down?)
- Performance, including uncertainty Evaluating assessment performance, Assessing uncertainty, Quality assurance and quality control
Conclusions
Background
Methods
Results
Attributes:
- Name
- Scope
- Definition
- Result