Talk:The mortality due to PM 2.5 from buses: Difference between revisions
(New section: Parent variables -- ~~~~) |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
|--[[User:Ninais|Ninais]] 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET)}} | |--[[User:Ninais|Ninais]] 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET)}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Parent variables -- [[User:Ninais|Ninais]] 17:53, 20 February 2008 (EET) == | |||
{{discussion | |||
|Dispute= Parent items in the causality should be variables in the assessment. | |||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |||
|Argumentation = | |||
{{defend|#(number): |Causality should refer to variables in the assessment: | |||
# "Primary fine PM concentration due to bus emissions" | |||
# "Concentration-response function for primary fine PM" | |||
|--[[User:Ninais|Ninais]] 17:53, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}}} |
Revision as of 15:53, 20 February 2008
Mortality in the formula -- Anne.knol 16:56, 20 February 2008 (EET)
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation: |
Scope should contain temporal information -- Ninais 17:20, 20 February 2008 (EET)
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←--#(1):: . The scope is not clear because it refers to number of premature deaths - but not the timeframe (daily, monthly, yearly etc), or whether or not it is yearly average, or in a particular year (i.e. 1997 or 2020) --Ninais 17:20, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
== Premature deaths should be considered as additional == Jgrellier 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET)
How to read discussions
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←--#(1):: . Premature deaths due to PM2.5 from buses should be defined as addtional to background premature deaths --Jgrellier 17:29, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ⇤--#(2):: . There is no such thing as 'additional' or 'premature' deaths. Everybody dies once, so in the end (let's say, if a whole cohort has died), no one died additionally. Instead, they have died earlier. (see next dispute) --Anne.knol 17:43, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack) |
Premature deaths --Anne.knol 17:43, 20 February 2008 (EET)
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←--#(1):: . 'premature deaths' should better be described as 'deaths put forward', since the concept of premature deaths suggests that there is something like a 'mature death' which I don't not think is the good terminology --Anne.knol 17:43, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
Delete "Effect of bus type on PM2.5 emissions and exposure" -- Ninais 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET)
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
←--#(1):: . "Effect of bus type on PM2.5 emissions and exposure" refers to the scenarios and assessment, but is not a parent variable (and "bus type" is not within the scope of the variable because it is a scenario in the assessment). --Ninais 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) |
Parent variables -- Ninais 17:53, 20 February 2008 (EET)
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation: |