Talk:The mortality due to PM 2.5 from buses: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
{{defend|#(1): |Premature deaths due to PM2.5 from buses should be defined as '''addtional''' to background premature deaths|--[[User:Jgrellier|Jgrellier]] 17:29, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}
{{defend|#(1): |Premature deaths due to PM2.5 from buses should be defined as '''addtional''' to background premature deaths|--[[User:Jgrellier|Jgrellier]] 17:29, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}
}}
== Delete "Effect of bus type on PM2.5 emissions and exposure"  -- [[User:Ninais|Ninais]] 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET) ==
{{discussion
|Dispute= "Effect of bus type on Pm2.5 emissions and exposure" should be deleted from causality
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found)
|Argumentation =
{{defend|#(1): |"Effect of bus type on PM2.5 emissions and exposure" refers to the scenarios and assessment, but is not a
parent variable (and "bus type" is not within the scope of the variable because it is a scenario in the assessment).
|--[[User:Ninais|Ninais]] 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET)}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 15:30, 20 February 2008

Mortality in the formula -- Anne.knol 16:56, 20 February 2008 (EET)

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
←--#(1):: . The background mortality (Mb) is input into the formula, whereas the Mortality (M) is the output of the formula. These are therefore two different parameters --Anne.knol 17:06, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Scope should contain temporal information -- Ninais 17:20, 20 February 2008 (EET)

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
←--#(1):: . The scope is not clear because it refers to number of premature deaths - but not the timeframe (daily, monthly, yearly etc), or whether or not it is yearly average, or in a particular year (i.e. 1997 or 2020) --Ninais 17:20, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

== Premature deaths should be considered as additional == Jgrellier 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET) How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons

←--#(1):: . Premature deaths due to PM2.5 from buses should be defined as addtional to background premature deaths --Jgrellier 17:29, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Delete "Effect of bus type on PM2.5 emissions and exposure" -- Ninais 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET)

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←--#(1):: . "Effect of bus type on PM2.5 emissions and exposure" refers to the scenarios and assessment, but is not a

parent variable (and "bus type" is not within the scope of the variable because it is a scenario in the assessment). --Ninais 17:30, 20 February 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_mortality_due_to_PM_2.5_from_buses&oldid=4407"