EU-kalat: Difference between revisions
(→Bayes model for dioxin concentrations: now works but mixing is still not great) |
|||
Line 229: | Line 229: | ||
* Model run 11.10.2017 with small and large herring [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Special:RTools&id=ICIWZTUZR6rlNwuD] (removed in update) | * Model run 11.10.2017 with small and large herring [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Special:RTools&id=ICIWZTUZR6rlNwuD] (removed in update) | ||
* Model run 12.3.2018: bugs fixed with data used in Bayes. In addition, redundant fish species removed and Omega assumed to be the same for herring and salmon. [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Special:RTools&id=k0n2CFnjdGBklm9E] | * Model run 12.3.2018: bugs fixed with data used in Bayes. In addition, redundant fish species removed and Omega assumed to be the same for herring and salmon. [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Special:RTools&id=k0n2CFnjdGBklm9E] | ||
* Model run 22.3.2018 [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Special:RTools&id= | * Model run 22.3.2018 [http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=Special:RTools&id=2jX2XxWpiIEZPyzJ] Model does not mix well. Thinning gives little help? | ||
<rcode name="bayes" label="Sample Bayes model (for developers only)" graphics=1> | <rcode name="bayes" label="Sample Bayes model (for developers only)" graphics=1> | ||
Line 328: | Line 318: | ||
# below.LOQ[i,j] ~ dinterval(-cong[i,j], -LOQ[j]) | # below.LOQ[i,j] ~ dinterval(-cong[i,j], -LOQ[j]) | ||
cong[i,1:C] ~ dmnorm(muind[i,], Omega[,]) | cong[i,1:C] ~ dmnorm(muind[i,], Omega[,]) | ||
muind[i,1:C] <- mu[fis[i],1:C] + lenp[fis[i]]*length[i] + timep*year[i] | muind[i,1:C] <- mu[fis[i],1:C] + lenp[fis[i]]*length[i] # + timep*year[i] | ||
} | } | ||
# Priors for parameters | # Priors for parameters | ||
# timep ~ dnorm(0, 0.0001) # Time trend. We don't want to use it yet | |||
for(i in 1:Fi) { # Fi = fish species | for(i in 1:Fi) { # Fi = fish species | ||
lenp[i] ~ dnorm(0,0.0001) # length parameter | lenp[i] ~ dnorm(0,0.0001) # length parameter | ||
pred[i,1:C] ~ dmnorm(mu[i,1:C]+lenp[i]*lenpred[i] | pred[i,1:C] ~ dmnorm(mu[i,1:C]+lenp[i]*lenpred[i], Omega[,]) # Model prediction. Not used: +timep*timepred | ||
for(j in 1:C) { | for(j in 1:C) { | ||
mu[i,j] ~ dnorm(0, 0.0001) # mu1[j], tau1[j]) # Congener-specific mean for fishes | mu[i,j] ~ dnorm(0, 0.0001) # mu1[j], tau1[j]) # Congener-specific mean for fishes | ||
Line 353: | Line 343: | ||
cong = log(cong), | cong = log(cong), | ||
length = eu3$Length, | length = eu3$Length, | ||
# year = eu3$Year, | |||
fis = match(eu3$Fish, fisl), | fis = match(eu3$Fish, fisl), | ||
lenpred = c(170, 860), | lenpred = c(170, 860), | ||
# timepred = 2009, | |||
Omega0 = diag(C)/100000 | Omega0 = diag(C)/100000 | ||
), | ), | ||
Line 363: | Line 353: | ||
) | ) | ||
update(jags, | update(jags, 1000) | ||
samps.j <- jags.samples( | samps.j <- jags.samples( | ||
Line 374: | Line 364: | ||
'pred' # predicted concentration for year 2009 and 17 cm herring, 80 cm salmon | 'pred' # predicted concentration for year 2009 and 17 cm herring, 80 cm salmon | ||
), | ), | ||
# thin=1000, | |||
N | N | ||
) | ) | ||
Line 386: | Line 377: | ||
lenp.mean = apply(samps.j$lenp[,,1], MARGIN = 1, FUN = mean), | lenp.mean = apply(samps.j$lenp[,,1], MARGIN = 1, FUN = mean), | ||
lenp.sd = apply(samps.j$lenp[,,1], MARGIN = 1, FUN = sd), | lenp.sd = apply(samps.j$lenp[,,1], MARGIN = 1, FUN = sd), | ||
mu = apply(samps.j$mu[,,,1], MARGIN = 1:2, FUN = mean) | mu = apply(samps.j$mu[,,,1], MARGIN = 1:2, FUN = mean) | ||
# timep.mean = apply(samps.j$lenp[,,1], MARGIN = 1, FUN = mean), | |||
# timep.sd = apply(samps.j$lenp[,,1], MARGIN = 1, FUN = sd) | |||
) | ) | ||
Line 417: | Line 408: | ||
coda.j <- coda.samples( | coda.j <- coda.samples( | ||
jags, | jags, | ||
c('mu', 'pred | c('mu', 'pred','lenp'), | ||
# thin=1000, | |||
N | N | ||
) | ) | ||
plot(coda.j) | plot(coda.j) | ||
coda.o <- coda.samples( | |||
jags, | |||
c('Omega'), | |||
N | |||
) | |||
plot(coda.o) | |||
</rcode> | </rcode> | ||
Revision as of 06:20, 22 March 2018
This page is a study.
The page identifier is Op_en3104 |
---|
Moderator:Arja (see all) |
|
Upload data
|
EU-kalat is a study, where concentrations of PCDD/Fs, PCBs, PBDEs and heavy metals have been measured from fish
Question
The scope of EU-kalat study was to measure concentrations of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) including dioxin (PCDD/F), PCB and BDE in fish from Baltic sea and Finnish inland lakes and rivers. [1] [2] [3].
Answer
The original sample results can be acquired from Opasnet base. The study showed that levels of PCDD/Fs and PCBs depends especially on the fish species. Highest levels were on salmon and large sized herring. Levels of PCDD/Fs exceeded maximum level of 4 pg TEQ/g fw multiple times. Levels of PCDD/Fs were correlated positively with age of the fish.
Mean congener concentrations as WHO2005-TEQ in Baltic herring can be printed out with this link or by running the codel below.
Rationale
Data
Data was collected between 2009-2010. The study contains years, tissue type, fish species, and fat content for each concentration measurement. Number of observations is 285.
There is a new study EU-kalat 3, which will produce results in 2016.
Calculations
Preprocess
- Preprocess model 22.2.2017 [4]
- Objects used in Benefit-risk assessment of Baltic herring and salmon intake
- Model run 25.1.2017 [5]
- Model run 22.5.2017 with new ovariables euRaw, euAll, euMain, and euRatio [6]
- Model run 23.5.2017 with adjusted ovariables euRaw, eu, euRatio [7]
- Model run 11.10.2017: Small herring and Large herring added as new species [8]
- Model rerun 15.11.2017 because the previous stored run was lost in update [9]
- Model run 21.3.2018: Small and large herring replaced by actual fish length [10]
Bayes model for dioxin concentrations
- Model run 28.2.2017 [11]
- Model run 28.2.2017 with corrected survey model [12]
- Model run 28.2.2017 with Mu estimates [13]
- Model run 1.3.2017 [14]
- Model run 23.4.2017 [15] produces list conc.param and ovariable concentration
- Model run 24.4.2017 [16]
- Model run 19.5.2017 without ovariable concentration [17] ⇤--#: . The model does not mix well, so the results should not be used for final results. --Jouni (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
- Model run 22.5.2017 with TEQdx and TEQpcb as the only Compounds [18]
- Model run 23.5.2017 debugged [19] [20] [21]
- Model run 24.5.2017 TEQdx, TECpcb -> PCDDF, PCB [22]
- Model run 11.10.2017 with small and large herring [23] (removed in update)
- Model run 12.3.2018: bugs fixed with data used in Bayes. In addition, redundant fish species removed and Omega assumed to be the same for herring and salmon. [24]
- Model run 22.3.2018 [25] Model does not mix well. Thinning gives little help?
Initiate conc_pcddf
- Model run 19.5.2017 [26]
- Model run 23.5.2017 with bugs fixed [27]
- Model run 12.10.2017: TEQ calculation added [28]
- Model rerun 15.11.2017 because the previous stored run was lost in update [29]
- 12.3.2018 adjusted to match the same Omega for all fish species [30]
⇤--#: . These codes should be coherent with POPs in Baltic herring. --Jouni (talk) 12:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
See also
References
- ↑ A. Hallikainen, H. Kiviranta, P. Isosaari, T. Vartiainen, R. Parmanne, P.J. Vuorinen: Kotimaisen järvi- ja merikalan dioksiinien, furaanien, dioksiinien kaltaisten PCB-yhdisteiden ja polybromattujen difenyylieettereiden pitoisuudet. Elintarvikeviraston julkaisuja 1/2004. [1]
- ↑ E-R.Venäläinen, A. Hallikainen, R. Parmanne, P.J. Vuorinen: Kotimaisen järvi- ja merikalan raskasmetallipitoisuudet. Elintarvikeviraston julkaisuja 3/2004. [2]
- ↑ Anja Hallikainen, Riikka Airaksinen, Panu Rantakokko, Jani Koponen, Jaakko Mannio, Pekka J. Vuorinen, Timo Jääskeläinen, Hannu Kiviranta. Itämeren kalan ja muun kotimaisen kalan ympäristömyrkyt: PCDD/F-, PCB-, PBDE-, PFC- ja OT-yhdisteet. Eviran tutkimuksia 2/2011. ISSN 1797-2981 ISBN 978-952-225-083-4 [3]