Talk:Congestion charge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amr Ebrahim (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amr Ebrahim (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
|Statements = The economic viability of tariffs and transformation of urban space will encourage more use of roads and cars. | |Statements = The economic viability of tariffs and transformation of urban space will encourage more use of roads and cars. | ||
|Resolution = | |||
|Resolved = | |||
|Argumentation = | |||
}} | |||
{{discussion | |||
|Statements = congestion charge sachems can restrict urban mobility and human capital growth. | |||
|Resolution = | |Resolution = | ||
|Resolved = | |Resolved = |
Revision as of 20:24, 28 April 2017
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement: Congestion charge scheme doesn't significantly affect air quality in cities.
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
|
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement: Congestion charge scheme constrains individual choice and behavior.
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
|
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement: The economic viability of tariffs and transformation of urban space will encourage more use of roads and cars.
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
|
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement: congestion charge sachems can restrict urban mobility and human capital growth.
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
|