Talk:Dealing with disputes: Difference between revisions
(→Notation of a ''non-mixed'' difference in opinion -- [[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 13:10, 6 February 2008 (EET): an argumentation related discussion from Intarese moved here) |
m (discussion form Intarese Help:Contributing to a discussion moved here) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''THIS IS THE DISCUSSION TAB.''' | |||
You can go back to the article by clicking on the ''article'' tab (on the left side of the discussion tab). | |||
''Please do not remove this text. It is part of an explanation on this wikipage.'' | |||
---- | |||
== Notation of a ''non-mixed'' difference in opinion == | == Notation of a ''non-mixed'' difference in opinion == | ||
Revision as of 10:21, 8 February 2008
THIS IS THE DISCUSSION TAB.
You can go back to the article by clicking on the article tab (on the left side of the discussion tab).
Please do not remove this text. It is part of an explanation on this wikipage.
Notation of a non-mixed difference in opinion
----#(1):: . What kind of symbols do I have to use, if I only doubt a standpoint but do not have an opposite standpoint, i.e. a non-mixed difference of opinion? Should I still use the attacking argument symbol (red arrow) or the comment symbol (the blue horizontal stripe)? --Sjuurd 16:08, 5 June 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)
----#(2):: . Well, we don't currently have arrow of doubt. Maybe this depends how strongly you are in doubt. I would prefer red arrow --Juha Villman 09:35, 11 June 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment)