Talk:Opasnet base structure: Difference between revisions
m (Help talk:Result database moved to Talk:Result database: Methods and tools are moved from the Help to the Main namespace) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== -- [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:39, 7 January 2008 (EET) == | == -- [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 11:39, 7 January 2008 (EET) == | ||
==Should all variables go to result distribution database?== | == Should all variables go to result distribution database? == | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
{{defend|#( | {{defend|#(1 P): |There should be two levels of variables: 1) The results of important variables are uploaded in the result database, and they should be coherent with each other. 2) Other variables that are less important are used in case-specific assessments. They don't need to be coherent with all variables in the result database, only with those within the same assessment. | ||
|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 23:52, 20 August 2007 (EEST)}} | |--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 23:52, 20 August 2007 (EEST)}} | ||
}} | {{comment|#(2 P): |How do you define an important variable? I see variable importance as a varying aspect, not absolute and often case-specific.|--[[User:Anna Karjalainen|Anna Karjalainen]] 14:17, 7 May 2008 (EEST)}}}} | ||
==A tentative structure for the result database== | ==A tentative structure for the result database== | ||
Revision as of 11:12, 7 April 2008
-- Jouni 11:39, 7 January 2008 (EET)
Should all variables go to result distribution database?
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--#(1 P):: . There should be two levels of variables: 1) The results of important variables are uploaded in the result database, and they should be coherent with each other. 2) Other variables that are less important are used in case-specific assessments. They don't need to be coherent with all variables in the result database, only with those within the same assessment. --Jouni 23:52, 20 August 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ----#(2 P):: . How do you define an important variable? I see variable importance as a varying aspect, not absolute and often case-specific. --Anna Karjalainen 14:17, 7 May 2008 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment) |
A tentative structure for the result database
Old, poor idea: Each variable is a table; each row has a fixed number of rows that equal to iterations (random samples); each row in the index (using Analytica terminology) is a column in the table.
New, better idea was moved to Help:Variable. The structural suggestion was moved to Help:Result database.