Intake fractions of PM: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(technical edits)
(codes fixed)
Line 11: Line 11:
== Answer ==
== Answer ==


<rcode name='answer' live=1>
<rcode name='answer' live=1 graphics=1>
library(OpasnetUtils)
library(OpasnetUtils)
library(ggplot2)


objects.latest("Op_en5813", code_name="initiate")
objects.latest("Op_en5813", code_name="initiate")


oprint(iF.PM2.5)
iF.PM2.5 <- EvalOutput(iF.PM2.5)
 
ggplot(iF.PM2.5@output, aes(x = iF.PM2.5Result, colour = Subcategory)) + geom_density() + theme_gray(base_size = 24)
 
</rcode>
</rcode>


Line 29: Line 33:
=== Calculations ===
=== Calculations ===


<rcode label="initiate" label="Initiate variable">
<rcode name="initiate" embed=1 label="Initiate variable">
library(OpasnetUtils)
library(OpasnetUtils)


iF.PM2.5 <- Ovariable("iFPM2.5", data = opbase.data("Op_en5813"))
iF.PM2.5 <- Ovariable("iF.PM2.5", data = opbase.data("Op_en5813"))


objects.store(iFPM2.5)
objects.store(iF.PM2.5)


cat("Object iFPM2.5 stored.\n")
cat("Object iF.PM2.5 stored.\n")
</rcode>
</rcode>



Revision as of 08:38, 15 February 2014



Question

What are intake fractions of airborne particulate matter for different emission sources and locations?

Answer

+ Show code

Rationale

Intake fractions of PM: Difference between revisions(per million)
ObsGeographical areaYearPM typeSource categorySubcategoryResultDescription of sub-categorySpecificationDescription
1Finland2000Anthropogenic PM2.5Power plantsLarge power plants0.18-0.37Emission from large (>50 MW) power plants (n=117)mode; min-maxTainio et al. (2010): 0.28 (0.18-0.37)
2Finland2000Anthropogenic PM2.5Power plantsSmall power plants0.27-0.44Emission from small (<50 MW) power plants mode; min-maxTainio et al. (2010): 0.34 (0.27-0.44)
3Northern Europe-Anthropogenic PM2.5Power plantsMajor power plants0.50-mean of all seasonsTainio et al. (2009)

Calculations

+ Show code


See also

Keywords

References


Related files

<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>