Opasnet talk:Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Discussion again | Discussion again | ||
{{discussion | |||
|Dispute= Is this really so? | |||
|Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) | |||
|Argumentation = | |||
{{attack|#1: |Definitely not|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST)}} | |||
:{{attack|#2: |Oh yes it is!!|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST)}} | |||
:{{defend|#4: |I so agree|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST)}} | |||
{{defend|#3: |I think so|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST)}} | |||
{{comment|#5: |What a stupid discussion!|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST)}} | |||
}} |
Revision as of 12:39, 28 May 2007
Discussion again
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
⇤--#1:: . Definitely not --Mikko Pohjola 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)
←--#3:: . I think so --Mikko Pohjola 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence) ----#5:: . What a stupid discussion! --Mikko Pohjola 15:39, 28 May 2007 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: comment) |