Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Miscellanous: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Marjaleena (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
Existing MSWI plant (capacity 50 000 t/a) is in Turku (since 1975), and more burning capacity is planned there for 150 000 t/a. | Existing MSWI plant (capacity 50 000 t/a) is in Turku (since 1975), and more burning capacity is planned there for 150 000 t/a. | ||
There are many plans for MSWI plants in the future. In Riihimäki the construction of 150 000 t/a plant has already begun and further away in Kotka there is environmental permit for an 80 000-100 000 t/a plant. Environmental permits were complaint about in Lahti, Kerava and Pori and that has interrupted projects for a while. In Jyväskylä and Seinäjoki environmental impact assessments has been done. Also Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council (YTV) has decided to start planning a new MSWI plant, decisions about position, capacity and technique will be made in the near future. | There are many plans for MSWI plants in the future. In Riihimäki the construction of 150 000 t/a plant has already begun and further away in Kotka there is environmental permit for an 80 000-100 000 t/a plant. Environmental permits were complaint about in Lahti, Kerava and Pori and that has interrupted projects for a while. In Jyväskylä and Seinäjoki environmental impact assessments has been done. In Virrat there was scenario about waste incineration, but that project has been interrupted. Also Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council (YTV) has decided to start planning a new MSWI plant, decisions about position, capacity and technique will be made in the near future. | ||
Also co-incineration has been used for waste, even though the tightened legislation has reducing this technique. For example in Pietarsaari tests for burning RDF in existing plant (refuse derived fuel) with other fuels have been recently done (capacity earlier 80 000 t/a). | Also co-incineration has been used for waste, even though the tightened legislation has reducing this technique. For example in Pietarsaari tests for burning RDF in existing plant (refuse derived fuel) with other fuels have been recently done (capacity earlier 80 000 t/a). | ||
| Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
|Index = | |Index = | ||
|Definition = | |Definition = | ||
|Unit = Burning | |Unit = Burning capacity of MSWI plant t/a | ||
|Result = | |Result = On the grounds of location, the best possibility would be in Pori. Based on the capacity of burning waste, the most likely places seem to be Turku or Riihimäki. | ||
|References = Uusiouutiset Vol 17(2006)2 | |References = Uusiouutiset Vol 17(2006)2 | ||
Regional Environmental Centres (Uusimaa, Southwest Finland, Pirkanmaa, West Finland) at http:// www.ymparisto.fi | Regional Environmental Centres (Uusimaa, Southwest Finland, Pirkanmaa, West Finland) at http:// www.ymparisto.fi | ||
Revision as of 08:46, 28 September 2006
See the main page of this assessment: Risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipal solid waste incinerator
- Secondary effects on waste separation, recycling etc.)
Municipal solid waste production in Häme
Pasi K
Municipal solid waste production in Häme D↷
Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland
Marjaleena
Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland D↷
Background of waste production and its relations to EU directive
Eva
EU legislation on waste incineration and landfilling.