Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Miscellanous: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 92: Line 92:


|Description = Option 0 in the environmental impact assessment for Hämeenkyrö MSWI was not to build the plant but transport the waste to be burned elsewhere or landfilled.  
|Description = Option 0 in the environmental impact assessment for Hämeenkyrö MSWI was not to build the plant but transport the waste to be burned elsewhere or landfilled.  
Existing MSWI plant (capacity 50 000 t/a) is in Turku (since 1975), and more burning capacity is planned there for 150 000 t/a. MSWI plants in the future In Riihimäki the construction of 150 000 t/a plant has already begun and further away in Kotka there is environmental permit for an 80 000-100 000 t/a plant. Environmental permits were complaint about in Lahti, Kerava and Pori and interrupted project for a while. In Jyväskylä and Seinäjoki environmental impact assessments has been done. Also Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council (YTV) has decided to start planning a new MSWI plant, decisions about position, capacity and technique will be made in the near future.  
Existing MSWI plant (capacity 50 000 t/a) is in Turku (since 1975), and more burning capacity is planned there for 150 000 t/a. MSWI plants in the future In Riihimäki the construction of 150 000 t/a plant has already begun and further away in Kotka there is environmental permit for an 80 000-100 000 t/a plant. Environmental permits were complaint about in Lahti, Kerava and Pori and that has interrupted projects for a while. In Jyväskylä and Seinäjoki environmental impact assessments has been done. Also Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council (YTV) has decided to start planning a new MSWI plant, decisions about position, capacity and technique will be made in the near future.  
Also co-incineration has been used for waste, even though the tightened legislation has reducing this technique. For example in Pietarsaari tests for burning RDF in existing plant (refuse derived fuel) with other fuels has been recently done (capacity earlier 80 000 t/a).  
Also co-incineration has been used for waste, even though the tightened legislation has reducing this technique. For example in Pietarsaari tests for burning RDF in existing plant (refuse derived fuel) with other fuels has been recently done (capacity earlier 80 000 t/a).  
|Inputs      = Waste management options {{Disclink|Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland}}
|Inputs      = Waste management options {{Disclink|Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland}}
Line 100: Line 100:
|Result      =  
|Result      =  
|References  = Uusiouutiset Vol 17(2006)2  
|References  = Uusiouutiset Vol 17(2006)2  
Regional Environmental Centres (Uusimaa, Southwest Finland, Pirkanmaa, West Finland) http:// www.ymparisto.fi
Regional Environmental Centres (Uusimaa, Southwest Finland, Pirkanmaa, West Finland) at http:// www.ymparisto.fi


Western Finland Environmental Permit Authority at http://www.ymparisto.fi  
Western Finland Environmental Permit Authority at http://www.ymparisto.fi  

Revision as of 07:48, 28 September 2006

See the main page of this assessment: Risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipal solid waste incinerator

  • Secondary effects on waste separation, recycling etc.)


Municipal solid waste production in Häme

Pasi K

Municipal solid waste production in Häme D↷

Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland

Marjaleena

Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland D↷

Background of waste production and its relations to EU directive

Eva

EU legislation on waste incineration and landfilling.
Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=Hämeenkyrö_MSWI_risk_assessment:_Miscellanous&oldid=1906"