Talk:Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment: Fine particles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
====Baseline PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure in Hämeenkyrö==== | ====Baseline PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure in Hämeenkyrö==== | ||
Anne K | Anne K | ||
{{Resolution | {{Resolution | ||
|Topic = | |Topic = Inputs are the variables that affect this variable | ||
|Statement = | |Statement = Inputs are the variables that affect this variable | ||
|Outcome = | |Outcome = | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = {{Defend| The variables whose change in their values cause changes to the values of a certain variable under scrutiny are considered inputs. therefore those are the ones that should be listed under this attribute, if any.| [[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 14:12, 26 September 2006 (EEST)}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
====PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö ==== | ====PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö ==== | ||
Revision as of 11:12, 26 September 2006
PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö
Päivi
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--It is important to be able to compare different risks. Seeing emission values for each sector makes this easier. The new emissions from the plants can then be put into perspective with variables people can perceive: they may have previous experience or a feeling about the amount of smoke coming from homes, or factories.: . --Jouni 06:05, 22 September 2006 (EEST)--Päivi Roivainen 09:59, 22 September 2006 (EEST) {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
<span class="argument" id="The whole emissions variable, and the PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa">←--The whole emissions variable, and the PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa: . Mikko Pohjola 11:05, 26 September 2006 (EEST) {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: <i id="The whole emissions variable, and the PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö as its subvariable, is an input to the well-being of local population variable, not vice versa" class="paradigm">science: defence)
|
PM2.5 emissions from MSWI, biofuel plant, and natural gas plant in Hämeenkyrö
Tommi
Discussion on ...
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
|
Baseline PM2.5 exposure in Hämeenkyrö
Anne K
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
←--The variables whose change in their values cause changes to the values of a certain variable under scrutiny are considered inputs. therefore those are the ones that should be listed under this attribute, if any.: . Mikko Pohjola 14:12, 26 September 2006 (EEST) {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|
PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö
Terhi Y
Discussion on ...
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
|
PM2.5 exposure-response function on population level
Sari
Discussion on ...
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement:
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
|