Talk:Risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipal solid waste incinerator: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 194: Line 194:
|Outcome      =  
|Outcome      =  
|Argumentation = MSWI and dumping site alternatives have diffent total noise and smell effects for people living near the emission source. Both should be analysed before final solution.
|Argumentation = MSWI and dumping site alternatives have diffent total noise and smell effects for people living near the emission source. Both should be analysed before final solution.
}}
{{Resolution
|Topic        = Discription: some ideas of different factors (both direct variables and indicators)
|Statement    = Variables
1 Noise
a) modelled noise maps / control noise measurements in neighborhoods of site based on:
- estimated amount of traffic near waste treatment site
- noise emissions from operating incinerator
- extra noise from birds (near landfill site)
Inputs: waste collection data, emission data from plant, bird invetory and voice emission data
b) noise distubance asked from local people
- how often people suffer from noise?
- continuous or episodic noise?
Inputs: Indicator data from systematic post questionaries and continuous feedback forms from web-site.
2 Smell
3 Sosial factors
4 Scenic values
5 Discomfort index
6 Concern index (Health effects)
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
}}



Revision as of 12:35, 21 September 2006

This page contains the discussions related to a risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipality solid waste incinenator. To start a new discussion, copy the template below into a new place in the edit mode.

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Objective

Variable: RA of Hämeenkyrö MSWI

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Discussion on the focus of Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
Discussion on the scope of Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


General variables

  1. Precautionary principle (disagreement)
    1. PP based on expected value, general
    2. PP based on worst-case or another 'conservative' scenario, general
    3. PP applied to emissions of municipal solid wasti incinerator (MSWI) in Hämeenkyrö
  2. Intake fraction (disambiguation)
    1. iF based on measured concentration fields
    2. iF based on exposure monitoring
    3. iF based on shortcuts

Fine particle variables

PM2.5 emissions in Hämeenkyrö

Päivi

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


PM2.5 emissions from MSWI, biofuel plant, and natural gas plant in Hämeenkyrö

Tommi

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Baseline PM2.5 exposure in Hämeenkyrö

Anne K

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


PM2.5 exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö

Terhi Y

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


PM2.5 exposure-response function on population level

Sari

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Dioxin variables

Dioxin emissions in Hämeenkyrö

Virpi

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Baseline dioxin exposure in Hämeenkyrö

Marjo

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Dioxin exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö

Martin

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Dioxin exposure-response function on population level

Sanna

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Indicator variables

  • Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case
  • Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö

Well-being of the population (smells, comfort, noise)

Kari Auri

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
If the decision model will be used to analyse alternative scenarios, we have to include both modelled variables and feedback variables here or alternatively define these own variable for the Pyrkilö -model.

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
MSWI and dumping site alternatives have diffent total noise and smell effects for people living near the emission source. Both should be analysed before final solution.

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

Effects on economy (esp. gas energy plant)

Juha

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Transportation costs of waste

Anne

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Health effects of dioxins and PM2.5

Anu T

Discussion on short term effects of dioxins

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:
←--Short term effects of dioxins only occur when the acute doses exceed the current background exposures by several orders of magnitude. This kind of exposures are not possible in the case of MSWI, and they can be excluded.: . --Jouni 10:33, 21 September 2006 (EEST), Anu {{{3}}} (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

Miscellaneous variables

  • Secondary effects on waste separation, recycling etc.)


Municipal solid waste production in Häme

Pasi K

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland

Marjaleena

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:


Background of waste production and its relations to EU directive

Eva

Discussion on ...

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement:

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation: