FrankfurtReport: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
** Bottom-up-approach and impact pathway (p. 17) | ** Bottom-up-approach and impact pathway (p. 17) | ||
** Categories: (p. 18) | ** Categories: (p. 18) | ||
*** air pollutants | *** air pollutants -> human health, material, crops | ||
*** noise -> human health, annoyance | |||
*** noise | *** accidents -> human health (costs of medical treatment are considered as internalised already because they are covered by insurance) | ||
*** nature and landscape -> different use of areas and the resulting impacts | |||
*** accidents | |||
*** nature and landscape | |||
** monetisation of impacts (p. 19) | ** monetisation of impacts (p. 19) | ||
*** indirect methods: e.g. hedonic price method (market price approach): e.g. people pay more to live in a place where the environmental quality is better | *** indirect methods: e.g. hedonic price method (market price approach): e.g. people pay more to live in a place where the environmental quality is better | ||
*** direct methods: surveys (contingent valuation) ask for valuation by people wo ist der unterschied zu wtp? | *** direct methods: surveys (contingent valuation) ask for valuation by people wo ist der unterschied zu wtp? | ||
** Classification of planes (e.g. according to noise level); number of seats in a specific type of plane can vary with the airline operating the flight (p. 22) | ** Classification of planes (e.g. according to noise level); number of seats in a specific type of plane can vary with the airline operating the flight (p. 22) | ||
Revision as of 15:05, 2 March 2007
Case-study Frankfurt Airport
„Ermittlung externer Kosten des Flugverkehrs am Flughafen Frankfurt/Main“
7 July 2003
Stephan A. Schmid Philipp Preiss Alexander Gressmann Rainer Friedrich
- Transport to an from airport is not considered as those external costs are allocated to cars and train directly (p. 12, 15/16)
- Scenarios: 2000 (is-scenario), 2015 (without extension of the airport; with different scenarios for additional runways) (p. 13)
- Total external costs for the scenarios and marginal external costs (external costs that are caused by one additional take-off and landing; needed for internalisation) (p. 13)
- Limits
- LTO-cycle (Landing/take-off cycle)
- Height: ca. 600 m (corresponds with the mean boundary layer height)
- Impacts of emissions are considered European-wide
- Noise data modelled by Hessisches Landesamt für Umwelt und Geologie are used among other data (square of 70 km by 70 km) (p. 15)
- External costs (methodology)
- Bottom-up-approach and impact pathway (p. 17)
- Categories: (p. 18)
- air pollutants -> human health, material, crops
- noise -> human health, annoyance
- accidents -> human health (costs of medical treatment are considered as internalised already because they are covered by insurance)
- nature and landscape -> different use of areas and the resulting impacts
- monetisation of impacts (p. 19)
- indirect methods: e.g. hedonic price method (market price approach): e.g. people pay more to live in a place where the environmental quality is better
- direct methods: surveys (contingent valuation) ask for valuation by people wo ist der unterschied zu wtp?
- Classification of planes (e.g. according to noise level); number of seats in a specific type of plane can vary with the airline operating the flight (p. 22)