Talk:Disability weights: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Parameters corrected) |
(evaluation moved from main page) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Peer review== | |||
{{peer review | |||
|reviewers = [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 22:45, 28 April 2008 (EEST) | |||
|respect = 2 | |||
|class = Technical report | |||
|evalutation = The variable is in preliminary stage.}} | |||
== Formula? == | == Formula? == | ||
Revision as of 14:24, 20 March 2010
Peer review
| This page has been peer reviewed. The page belongs to class Technical report. The amount of respect is 2 onors.
Reviewers: Jouni 22:45, 28 April 2008 (EEST) |
| The basis for the review is the quality and applicability of content for a potential reader. The target population may be different for different classes. See possible classes and typical respects. |
Formula?
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement: Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name.
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
|
Normalizing DALY weights?
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement: Normalizing DALY weights has been proposed as a solution towards the fact that uncertainty in smaal DALY weights affect overall uncertainty much more than uncertainty in large weights. Does anyone know how this might work?
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
|