Talk:Disability weights: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Formula?) |
m (moved Talk:DALY weights to Talk:Disability weights: This is the correct term.) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Peer review== | |||
{{peer review | |||
|reviewers = [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 22:45, 28 April 2008 (EEST) | |||
|respect = 2 | |||
|class = Technical report | |||
|evalutation = The variable is in preliminary stage.}} | |||
== Formula? == | == Formula? == | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| | |Statements= Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name. | ||
| | |Resolution= | ||
|Argumentation = | |||
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | |||
}} | |||
== Normalizing DALY weights? == | |||
{{discussion | |||
|Statements= Normalizing DALY weights has been proposed as a solution towards the fact that uncertainty in smaal DALY weights affect overall uncertainty much more than uncertainty in large weights. Does anyone know how this might work? | |||
|Resolution= | |||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 15:17, 13 January 2011
Peer review
This page has been peer reviewed. The page belongs to class Technical report. The amount of respect is 2 onors.
Reviewers: Jouni 22:45, 28 April 2008 (EEST) |
The basis for the review is the quality and applicability of content for a potential reader. The target population may be different for different classes. See possible classes and typical respects. |
Formula?
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement: Is "formula" the right place for this excel table? If not, where should the table be? If it is the right place, I think "formula" is a wrong name.
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
|
Normalizing DALY weights?
Fact discussion: . |
---|
Opening statement: Normalizing DALY weights has been proposed as a solution towards the fact that uncertainty in smaal DALY weights affect overall uncertainty much more than uncertainty in large weights. Does anyone know how this might work?
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons
|