Talk:Data: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: == Fitness for purpose == {{discussion |Dispute= Fitness for purpose of data should be emphasized in the fact sheet |Outcome= Under discussion (to be changed when a conclusion is found) |...) |
(Parameters corrected) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{discussion | {{discussion | ||
| | |Statements= Fitness for purpose of data should be emphasized in the fact sheet | ||
| | |Resolution= | ||
|Argumentation = | |Argumentation = | ||
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons | ||
{{defend| | {{defend|1|Does it come out clearly (in the fact sheet structure) that we want the data to be described in a "fitness for purpose" way?|--[[User:Alexandra Kuhn|Alexandra Kuhn]]}} | ||
:{{attack| | :{{attack|2|The fitness for purpose for data is determined by the particular use purpose in each case. I do not know if it can be addressed in general from the point of view of the data any more than by explicitly defining the scope of the data. The fitness of the data for a particular purpose is always considered from the point of view of the specific need (e.g. an assessment), so it is not an intrinsic property of the data itself, but a situated property of the data in relation to the need.|--[[User:Mikko Pohjola|Mikko Pohjola]] 14:20, 15 May 2008 (EEST)}} | ||
::{{comment|3|Yes, you are right. But still I think one could give a hint (example, criteria) for what kind of purposes the data could be used and for which not.|--[[User:Alexandra Kuhn|Alexandra Kuhn]] 07:48, 16 May 2008 (EEST)}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:17, 16 November 2009
Fitness for purpose
| Fact discussion: . |
|---|
| Opening statement: Fitness for purpose of data should be emphasized in the fact sheet
Closing statement: Resolution not yet found. (A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.) |
| Argumentation:
Add argumentation using attack-, defend- and comment buttons ←--1: . Does it come out clearly (in the fact sheet structure) that we want the data to be described in a "fitness for purpose" way? --Alexandra Kuhn (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)
|