Talk:Decision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(-- ~~~~) |
m (moved Talk:Decision variable to Talk:Decision: "Decision" is a simpler and more understandable term. There is no specific reason to emphasise that a decision is a variable (although it typically is).) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Term: policy scenario== | ==Term: policy scenario== | ||
I think that the use of the term "policy scenario" is rather misleading. This tends to suggest that the baseline scenario represents a situation somehow "outside of policy" i.e. that it represents a situation where no policy is shaping the health impacts/risks of interest. I think that the term "case scenario" is much preferable to this. [[User:Jgrellier|Jgrellier]] 16:42, 22 June 2007 (EEST) | I think that the use of the term "policy scenario" is rather misleading. This tends to suggest that the baseline scenario represents a situation somehow "outside of policy" i.e. that it represents a situation where no policy is shaping the health impacts/risks of interest. I think that the term "case scenario" is much preferable to this. [[User:Jgrellier|Jgrellier]] 16:42, 22 June 2007 (EEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:02, 20 February 2012
Term: policy scenario
I think that the use of the term "policy scenario" is rather misleading. This tends to suggest that the baseline scenario represents a situation somehow "outside of policy" i.e. that it represents a situation where no policy is shaping the health impacts/risks of interest. I think that the term "case scenario" is much preferable to this. Jgrellier 16:42, 22 June 2007 (EEST)
Value of the BAU scenario
The previous sentence (on the shape of the result distribution of the BAU option) seems to lack generality, since the data type may also be non-numerical. Erkki Kuusisto 14:23, 22 January 2008 (EET)