Cost effectiveness sensitivity: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{encyclopedia}}
{{study|moderator=Jouni}}


== Question ==


The effects of alternative vaccine compositions on the outcomes of the cost-benefit analysis were assessed. Five modifications for PCV10 and one for PCV13 were considered
The effects of alternative vaccine compositions on the outcomes of the cost-effectiveness analysis were assessed. Results are reported for PCV10 with modified effects for serotypes 19A and 6A and for PCV13 with modified effects for serotypes 3 and 6C.


Conclusion: The assumption about serotype 3 in PCV13 is crucial. In addition, assumptions about the role of 6A in PCV10 is important.
== Answer ==


Conclusion: The assumption about serotype 3 in PCV13 is crucial.
In addition, assumptions about the role of 6A in PCV10 is important.


  PCV13adv.inIPD
If serotype 3 is not included as a vaccine type in PCV13, then the differences between PCV10 and PCV13 in IPD, quality adjusted life years gained and medical costs are small (see Tables 1-7 in Section A below). Considering the magnitudes of these differences in view of the intrinsic uncertainties in the model, PCV10 and PCV13 can be regarded as equally effective.
    = (IPD under PCv10) - (IPD under PCV13)
    if positive, PCV13 saves IPD compared to PCV10


  price of PCV13
== Rationale ==
    = if PCV10 price set at 20e, what is the matching price for PCV13?
<br>
Cost-effectiveness sensitivity analysis results are divided into sections A,B and C.
<br>
==A.Vaccine effects on IPD, QALYs and costs by age group for alternative scenarios==
<br>


   ICER
'''Quantities tabulated:'''
    = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PCV10 at price 20e
    
    (in this table, this value is also average cost per QALY)
  IPD  = number of IPD cases per year in Finland
  IPD decrease = decrease in IPD due to the first mentioned vaccine
 
  QALYs lost = QALYs lost due to IPD per year in Finland, in years
              (QALYs related to IPD only)
              QALY = quality adjusted life year
  QALYs gained = QALYs gained due to the first mentioned vaccine
 
  Medical costs = Medical costs due to IPD per year in Finland in 1000 euros
                  (costs related to IPD only)
  Medical savings = Difference in medical costs in 1000 euros per year
                    in favor of the first  mentioned  vaccine


'''Vaccine formulation considered:'''
 
  PCV10 includes the 10 serotypes in PCV10 and direct effects for serotypes 6A and 19A
  PCV10(6Af) includes the 10 serotypes in PCV10 amended
            by serotype 6A and direct effects (##) for 19A
 
  PCV13  includes 12 serotypes in PCV13, serotype 3 excluded.
        Assumes direct effects for serotypes 3  and 6C.
  PCV13(6Cf) includes 12 serotypes in PCV13, serotype 3 excluded
            and 6C added. Assumes direct effects  for serotypes 3.


  rows:
<br>
   [1]  pcv10     
'''Results''':
   [2] pcv10+19A direct effects
<br>
  [3] pcv+6A     
   * 1.No Vaccination
   [4]  pcv10+19A(direct only)+6A
   --------------                      age group
   [5]  pcv10+19A full 
                    0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    44- 64    65- 100 Total
   [6] pcv10+19Af+6=PCV13-3
                    ----    -----    -----    -----    ------ -----
   IPD                330      26      124      236        302  1017
   QALYs lost        156      12      284      605        558  1615
   Medical costs (#) 918      70      1279      2431      2146  6843


   columns:
   * 2.PCV10 vs "No Vaccination"
   [1] pcv13-3        
   --------------                      age group
   [2]  pcv13
                    0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    44- 64    65- 100 Total
                    ----    -----    -----    -----    ------  -----
  IPD decrease      225      15        49        30        45    362
  QALYs gained      105        7       102        76        86    376
   Medical savings(#) 608      37      504      306        320  1774


  * 3.PCV13 vs "No Vaccination"
  --------------                      age group
                    0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    44- 64    65- 100  Total
                    ----    -----    -----    -----    ------  -----
  IPD decrease      246      15        43        16        47    366
  QALYs gained      114        7        86        39        89    334
  Medical savings    656      38      443      160        335  1631
  * 4.PCV13 vs PCV10
  --------------                      age group
                    0- 4    5- 19    20- 44      44- 64  65- 100  Total
                    ----    -----    -----    -----    ------  -----
  IPD decrease        21        0        -6        -14        2      4
  QALYs gained        9        0      -16        -37        3    -42
  Medical savings    48        1      -61        -146      15  -143
    * 5.PCV13(6Cf) vs PCV10
  --------------                      age group
                      0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    45- 64  65-100  Total
                      ----    -----    ------  -------  ------  -----
  IPD decrease          11    -1      -11      -29      -10      -40
  QALYs gained          4    -1      -29      -76      -21    -123
  Medical savings      17    -2      -116      -299      -74    -474
  * 6.PCV13 vs PCV10(6Af)
  --------------                      age group
                      0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    45- 64  65- 100 Total
                      ----    -----    ------  -------  ------  -----
  IPD decrease          31      2        1        6      14      54
  QALYs gained          15      1        1        13      28      57
  Medical savings      83      5        10        55      103      256
  * 7.PCV13(6Cf) vs PCV10(6Af)
  --------------                      age group
                    0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    45- 64  65- 100  Total
                      ----    -----    ------  -------  ------  -----
  IPD decrease        21      1        -4        -9        2        10
  QALYs gained        10      0      -12      -26        4      -24
  Medical savings      52      2      -45      -98      14      -75
   
   


                 PCV13adv.inIPD   price of PCV13    ICER
'''Interpretation''':
                  --------------  --------------    ---------------
<br>
                  PCV13-3 PCV13   PCV13-3  PCV13    PCV13-3   PCV13
Table 1 displays quantities when no vaccination is applied and Tables  2-3 display results for
                    ---     ---     -----   ---     -----     ----
the default scenarios PCV10 and PCV13. The vaccines decrease QALYs and medical costs
   pcv10            12     150       18    38        8077     8077
by approximately 20-25%.
   pcv10+19Ad       -2    134       17    37        7714     7714
In comparison to these effets, the differences pertaining to pairwise comparisons of various
   pcv10+6A         50     188      25   55        13590   13590
versions of the vaccines (Tables 4-7) are small. Negative numbers in Tables 4-7 indicate
   pcv10+19Ad+6A    32    169       24    52        12724    12724
situations favorable to PCV10.
   pcv10+19Af       -31    105       15   32        6198    6199
<br>
   pcv10+19Af+6A     *    137        *   43            *    9672
 
                                  (PCV10 price=20)
'''(*)'''= In the calculations above, the original observed/predicted number of IPD cases
among under 3 year old children is multiplied 3.75. This adjustment was made to
better reflect the actual disease incidence 
(reference: Palmu et al. (2014) Vaccine effectiveness of the pneumococcal..,
The Lancet Resp. Med.Vol2,9,p.717-)
 
'''(#)'''= costs and savings are given in 1000 euros
 
'''(##)'''= a vaccine with "only direct effects" for a particular serotype means that,
for vaccinated persons, vaccine efficacy against IPD caused by this serotype is 90% with
a waning rate of 10% per year. In practise this means that approximately 70% of the
serotype-specific IPD is eliminated among the <5 year olds. The implications of
this modification to the results pertaining to the population as a whole
are quite small and correspond closely to assuming no vaccine efficacy against 
the serotype in question.
 
<br>
 
==B. Vaccine effects on IPD, QALYs and costs for alternative scenarios, summary==
<br>
 
'''Quantities tabulated''':
  IPD decrease = decrease in IPD due to the vaccine appearing in
                 the column label vs the vaccine appearing in the row
  QALYs gained = same for QALYS gained (QALYs related to IPD only)
  Medical savings = same for saving in medical costs (costs related to IPD only)
 
'''Vaccine formulations considered''':
PCV10(a) vaccine including all of the 10 serotypes
PCV10 includes the 10 serotypes in PCV10 and direct effects for serotypes 6A and 19A
PCV10(6Af) includes the 10 serotypes in PCV10 amended
            by serotype 6A and direct effects (##) for 19A
PCV13(a) vaccine including all of the 13 serotypes, including serotype 3
PCV13  includes 12 serotypes in PCV13, serotype 3 excluded.
        Assumes direct effects for serotypes 3  and 6C.
PCV13(6Cf) includes 12 serotypes in PCV13, serotype 3 excluded
            and 6C added. Assumes direct effects   for serotypes 3.
 
<br>
'''Results''':
<br>
  IPD decrease                                                                                         
  ------------                         
                PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf)
                ------  -----  ----------     
  PCV10(a)    227      95      50           
  PCV10        137      4      -40           
  PCV10(6Af)  187      54      10           
 
   QALYs gained                                                                                         
  ------------                     
                PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf)       
                ------  -----  ----------
  PCV10(a)    305      5      -79           
  PCV10        260      -42    -123         
  PCV10(6Af)  357      57      -24         
 
  Medical costs saved (in 1000 euros)                                                                               
   -------------------
                PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf)
                ------  -----  ----------
  PCV10(a)    1294    125    -215   
  PCV10        1035    -143    -474   
  PCV10(6Af)   1425    256    -75   
 
 
'''Interpretation''':
<br>
These are summaries of Tables 4-7 in Section A now also
including "full" 10- and 13- valent versions of the vaccines.
The crucial effect of inclusion of serotype 3 in PCV13
is clear.
 
<br>
 
==C. Acceptable price level under alternative scenarios for PCV13 when price of PCV10 set at 20 and 30==
 
<br>
 
'''Quantities tabulated and vaccine formulations considered''':
 
<br>
Column and row labels as in tables as in Section B. The entries
are prices acceptable for PCV13 when PCV10 price is 10 or 20.
Any price below the given value is acceptable for PCV13.
<br>
 
In addition, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER)is given.
This is the ICER either when the more effective vaccine is
compared to the other or when the less effective is compared to 
the "no vaccination" scenario. It corresponds to the average
price of a QALY gain when either of the vaccines is chosen  
assuming the indicated price level.
 
<br>
 
'''Results''':
<br>
 
  Max price for PCV13 when price of PCV10 = 20 
   --------------------------------------------
                                                       
                PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf)   ICER(#)
                ------   ----- ----------   ----
   PCV10(a)     38       21      16          6.27      
   PCV10       33       18      14          4.85      
   PCV10(6Af)  44      24      18         7.92      
 
 
 
  Max price for PCV13 when price of PCV10 = 30
  --------------------------------------------
                                                           
              PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf)   ICER(#) 
              ------  -----  ----------   ----
   PCV10(a)    57       31      24           11.6    
   PCV10       50       27      21          9.63    
   PCV10(6Af)  66      36     27          14.3    
 
 
'''Note''':
<br>
(#)= in 1000 euros
<br>
 
These tables are calculated taking into account benefits
related to IPD only. If other disease entities are taken into
accoount, the vaccines may well be cost saving (in terms of
total health care costs) and these tables are to be
interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, they indicate
that if serotype 3 is not included in PCV13, then the
differences between the vaccines are much smaller and,
depending on assumptions, may be in favor of either
one of the vaccines.
 
<br>
== See also ==
 
{{pneumococcal vaccine}}

Latest revision as of 10:35, 14 September 2014


Question

The effects of alternative vaccine compositions on the outcomes of the cost-effectiveness analysis were assessed. Results are reported for PCV10 with modified effects for serotypes 19A and 6A and for PCV13 with modified effects for serotypes 3 and 6C.

Answer

Conclusion: The assumption about serotype 3 in PCV13 is crucial. In addition, assumptions about the role of 6A in PCV10 is important.

If serotype 3 is not included as a vaccine type in PCV13, then the differences between PCV10 and PCV13 in IPD, quality adjusted life years gained and medical costs are small (see Tables 1-7 in Section A below). Considering the magnitudes of these differences in view of the intrinsic uncertainties in the model, PCV10 and PCV13 can be regarded as equally effective.

Rationale


Cost-effectiveness sensitivity analysis results are divided into sections A,B and C.

A.Vaccine effects on IPD, QALYs and costs by age group for alternative scenarios


Quantities tabulated: 

 IPD  =  number of IPD cases per year in Finland
 IPD decrease = decrease in IPD due to the first mentioned vaccine
 
 QALYs lost = QALYs lost due to IPD per year in Finland, in years
              (QALYs related to IPD only)
              QALY = quality adjusted life year
 QALYs gained = QALYs gained due to the first mentioned vaccine
 
 Medical costs = Medical costs due to IPD per year in Finland in 1000 euros 
                 (costs related to IPD only)
 Medical savings = Difference in medical costs in 1000 euros per year 
                   in favor of the first   mentioned   vaccine

Vaccine formulation considered: 

 PCV10 includes the 10 serotypes in PCV10 and direct effects for serotypes 6A and 19A
 PCV10(6Af) includes the 10 serotypes in PCV10 amended 
            by serotype 6A and direct effects (##) for 19A
 
 PCV13  includes 12 serotypes in PCV13, serotype 3 excluded. 
        Assumes direct effects for serotypes 3   and 6C.
 PCV13(6Cf) includes 12 serotypes in PCV13, serotype 3 excluded 
            and 6C added. Assumes direct effects   for serotypes 3.


Results: 

 * 1.No Vaccination
 --------------                       age group
                   0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    44- 64    65- 100  Total
                   ----    -----     -----     -----     ------  -----
 IPD                330       26       124       236        302   1017
 QALYs lost         156       12       284       605        558   1615
 Medical costs (#)  918       70      1279      2431       2146   6843

 * 2.PCV10 vs "No Vaccination"
 --------------                       age group
                   0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    44- 64    65- 100  Total
                   ----    -----     -----     -----     ------  -----
 IPD decrease       225       15        49        30         45    362
 QALYs gained       105        7       102        76         86    376
 Medical savings(#) 608       37       504       306        320   1774

 * 3.PCV13 vs "No Vaccination"
 --------------                       age group
                   0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    44- 64    65- 100  Total
                   ----    -----     -----     -----     ------  -----
 IPD decrease       246       15        43        16         47    366
 QALYs gained       114        7        86        39         89    334
 Medical savings    656       38       443       160        335   1631

 * 4.PCV13 vs PCV10
 --------------                       age group
                   0- 4    5- 19    20- 44      44- 64  65- 100  Total 
                   ----    -----     -----     -----     ------  -----
 IPD decrease        21        0        -6         -14        2      4
 QALYs gained         9        0       -16         -37        3    -42
 Medical savings     48        1       -61        -146       15   -143

   * 5.PCV13(6Cf) vs PCV10
 --------------                       age group
                     0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    45- 64   65-100  Total
                     ----    -----    ------   -------   ------  -----
 IPD decrease          11     -1       -11       -29      -10      -40
 QALYs gained           4     -1       -29       -76      -21     -123
 Medical savings       17     -2      -116      -299      -74     -474

 * 6.PCV13 vs PCV10(6Af)
 --------------                       age group
                     0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    45- 64   65- 100 Total
                     ----    -----    ------   -------   ------  -----
 IPD decrease          31      2         1         6       14       54
 QALYs gained          15      1         1        13       28       57
 Medical savings       83      5        10        55      103      256

 * 7.PCV13(6Cf) vs PCV10(6Af)
 --------------                       age group
                    0- 4    5- 19    20- 44    45- 64   65- 100  Total
                     ----    -----    ------   -------   ------  -----
 IPD decrease         21      1        -4        -9        2        10
 QALYs gained         10      0       -12       -26        4       -24
 Medical savings      52      2       -45       -98       14       -75

Interpretation:
Table 1 displays quantities when no vaccination is applied and Tables 2-3 display results for the default scenarios PCV10 and PCV13. The vaccines decrease QALYs and medical costs by approximately 20-25%. In comparison to these effets, the differences pertaining to pairwise comparisons of various versions of the vaccines (Tables 4-7) are small. Negative numbers in Tables 4-7 indicate situations favorable to PCV10.

(*)= In the calculations above, the original observed/predicted number of IPD cases among under 3 year old children is multiplied 3.75. This adjustment was made to better reflect the actual disease incidence (reference: Palmu et al. (2014) Vaccine effectiveness of the pneumococcal.., The Lancet Resp. Med.Vol2,9,p.717-)

(#)= costs and savings are given in 1000 euros

(##)= a vaccine with "only direct effects" for a particular serotype means that, for vaccinated persons, vaccine efficacy against IPD caused by this serotype is 90% with a waning rate of 10% per year. In practise this means that approximately 70% of the serotype-specific IPD is eliminated among the <5 year olds. The implications of this modification to the results pertaining to the population as a whole are quite small and correspond closely to assuming no vaccine efficacy against the serotype in question.


B. Vaccine effects on IPD, QALYs and costs for alternative scenarios, summary


Quantities tabulated: 

 IPD decrease = decrease in IPD due to the vaccine appearing in 
                the column label vs the vaccine appearing in the row
 QALYs gained = same for QALYS gained (QALYs related to IPD only)
 Medical savings = same for saving in medical costs (costs related to IPD only)

Vaccine formulations considered: 

PCV10(a) vaccine including all of the 10 serotypes
PCV10 includes the 10 serotypes in PCV10 and direct effects for serotypes 6A and 19A
PCV10(6Af) includes the 10 serotypes in PCV10 amended 
           by serotype 6A and direct effects (##) for 19A

PCV13(a) vaccine including all of the 13 serotypes, including serotype 3
PCV13  includes 12 serotypes in PCV13, serotype 3 excluded. 
       Assumes direct effects for serotypes 3   and 6C.
PCV13(6Cf) includes 12 serotypes in PCV13, serotype 3 excluded 
           and 6C added. Assumes direct effects   for serotypes 3.


Results: 

  IPD decrease                                                                                          
  ------------                          
               PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf) 
               ------   -----  ----------       
  PCV10(a)     227      95      50             
  PCV10        137      4       -40            
  PCV10(6Af)   187      54      10             

  QALYs gained                                                                                          
  ------------                      
               PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf)        
               ------   -----  ----------
  PCV10(a)     305      5       -79            
  PCV10        260      -42     -123           
  PCV10(6Af)   357      57      -24           

  Medical costs saved (in 1000 euros)                                                                                
  -------------------
               PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf) 
               ------   -----  ----------
  PCV10(a)     1294     125     -215    
  PCV10        1035     -143    -474    
  PCV10(6Af)   1425     256     -75


Interpretation:
These are summaries of Tables 4-7 in Section A now also including "full" 10- and 13- valent versions of the vaccines. The crucial effect of inclusion of serotype 3 in PCV13 is clear.


C. Acceptable price level under alternative scenarios for PCV13 when price of PCV10 set at 20 and 30


Quantities tabulated and vaccine formulations considered:


Column and row labels as in tables as in Section B. The entries are prices acceptable for PCV13 when PCV10 price is 10 or 20. Any price below the given value is acceptable for PCV13.

In addition, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER)is given. This is the ICER either when the more effective vaccine is compared to the other or when the less effective is compared to the "no vaccination" scenario. It corresponds to the average price of a QALY gain when either of the vaccines is chosen assuming the indicated price level.


Results: 

  Max price for PCV13 when price of PCV10 = 20  
  --------------------------------------------
                                                        
               PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf)   ICER(#)
               ------   -----  ----------   ----
  PCV10(a)     38       21      16          6.27     
  PCV10        33       18      14          4.85     
  PCV10(6Af)   44       24      18          7.92     



  Max price for PCV13 when price of PCV10 = 30
  --------------------------------------------
                                                            
              PCV13(a) PCV13  PCV13(6Cf)    ICER(#)  
              ------   -----  ----------    ----
  PCV10(a)    57       31      24           11.6    
  PCV10       50       27      21           9.63    
  PCV10(6Af)  66       36      27           14.3


Note:
(#)= in 1000 euros

These tables are calculated taking into account benefits related to IPD only. If other disease entities are taken into accoount, the vaccines may well be cost saving (in terms of total health care costs) and these tables are to be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, they indicate that if serotype 3 is not included in PCV13, then the differences between the vaccines are much smaller and, depending on assumptions, may be in favor of either one of the vaccines.


See also

Tendering process for pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Parts of the assessment

Comparison criteria for vaccine   · Epidemiological modelling   · Economic evaluation

Background information

Sensitivity analysis · Replacement   · Pneumococcal vaccine products   · Finnish vaccination schedule   · Selected recent publications

Help for discussion and wiki editing

Pages in Finnish

Pneumokokkirokotteen hankinta  · Rokotteen vertailuperusteet · Epidemiologinen malli · Taloudellinen arviointi · Pneumokokkirokotteen turvallisuus

Work scheduling · Monitoring the effectiveness of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine · Glossary of vaccine terminology


Retrieved from "https://en.opasnet.org/index.php?title=Cost_effectiveness_sensitivity&oldid=33816"