File:Swine flu story.ppt: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(uploaded a new version of "File:Swine flu story.ppt": A new version, presented in CII for MSc students, 24 Oct 2011. Contains results from the Darm course assessment (but not much from the final THL report published in September 1, 2011)) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
# '''Scope of contribution''', referring to which aspects of the issue at hand participants are invited or allowed to contribute to. | # '''Scope of contribution''', referring to which aspects of the issue at hand participants are invited or allowed to contribute to. | ||
# '''Impact of contribution''', referring to what extent are participant contributions allowed to have influence on the outcomes, i.e. how much weight is given to participant contributions. | # '''Impact of contribution''', referring to what extent are participant contributions allowed to have influence on the outcomes, i.e. how much weight is given to participant contributions. | ||
==References== | |||
<references/> | |||
== Related files == | |||
{{mfiles}} | |||
{{eracedu}} | |||
Latest revision as of 08:14, 2 February 2012
This page is a lecture.
The page identifier is Op_en4942 |
|---|
| Moderator:Mikko Pohjola (see all) |
|
|
| Upload data
|
Contains a draft of an introductory overview to the Finnish swine flu case
Different aspects on the media content
- What is discussed? Contents, discourses, meanings.
- Who talks? Whose point of view is presented? How are issues framed? Interaction settings?
- How do people talk? Argumentation, rhetoric methods, use of language, prejudices...
- E.g. How is swine flu or authority, citizen or expert knowledge constructed? What meanings are communicated? In what ways?
Important aspects in narcolepsy news
- (rough order of occurrence)
- Emphasis on threat and fear
- Taking over the problem
- Reporting about the spread of swine flu
- Preparedness and prevention
- Survival and protection
- Emphasising familiarity and safety
- Impacts of swine flu
- Criticising authorities
- Advice about what should (have been) done
- Emphasising the responsibility of authorities
Development of narcolepsy assessment
- Spring 2010 Neurologists surprised about # of new narcolepsy cases.
- June 2010 Neurologists contact THL about their findings.
- 18.8.2010 The MPA (Sweden) investigates reports of narcolepsy in patients vaccinated with Pandemrix MPA [1]
- 18.8.2010 Expert: Unlikely that H1N1 vaccine and narcolepsy have connection YLE [2]
- 18.8.2010 THL will study the connection. Vaccine and narcolepsy experts will meet in the afternoon to design the study. YLE
- 19.8.2010 The study has been started. It will last for months. THL [3]
- 24.8.2010 THL recommends to stop Pandemrix vaccination. THL [4]
- 27.8.2010 European Medicines Agency starts review of Pandemrix EMA [5] YLE [6]
- 23.9.2010 EMA: Evidence insufficient to determine causal link. Pandemrix benefits larger than risks. EMA [7]
Development of narcolepsy assessment (2/2)
- 8.9.2010 Swedish study shows no connection between vaccination and narcolepsy MTV3 [8]
- 17.11.2010 Ties Between Big Pharma and THL Draw Complaints YLE [9]
- 30.1.2011 Swine flu faccination to children maybe a mistake YLE [10]
- 31.1.2011 First assessment report published by THL [11]
- 1.2.2011 THL: Pandemrix vaccine increased the risk of narcolepsy YLE [12]
- 18.2.2011 EMA: Causal relationship not established EMA [13]
- August 2011: Final assessment report will be published by THL
The five dimensions of openness:
- Scope of participation, referring to who are allowed to participate in the process.
- Access to information, referring to what information regarding the issue at hand is made available to participants.
- Timing of openness, referring to when participants are invited or allowed to participate.
- Scope of contribution, referring to which aspects of the issue at hand participants are invited or allowed to contribute to.
- Impact of contribution, referring to what extent are participant contributions allowed to have influence on the outcomes, i.e. how much weight is given to participant contributions.
References
Related files
<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>
|
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 10:57, 24 October 2011 | (1.64 MB) | Jouni (talk | contribs) | A new version, presented in CII for MSc students, 24 Oct 2011. Contains results from the Darm course assessment (but not much from the final THL report published in September 1, 2011). |
| 08:49, 31 March 2011 | (1.43 MB) | Jouni (talk | contribs) | Minor changes | |
| 06:54, 31 March 2011 | (1.37 MB) | Jouni (talk | contribs) | Previous version was corrupted, so replaced. In addition, five dimensions of openness were added. | |
| 05:00, 31 March 2011 | (1.34 MB) | Jouni (talk | contribs) | Slides about narcolepsy assessment added | |
| 07:20, 28 February 2011 | (1.3 MB) | Mikko Pohjola (talk | contribs) | Just some small edits. | |
| 17:00, 27 February 2011 | (1.57 MB) | Mikko Pohjola (talk | contribs) | Contains a draft of an introductory overview to the Finnish swine flu case |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
There are no pages that use this file.