Fukushima nuclear accident: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(radiation map added)
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
[[op_fi:Japanin luonnonkatastrofi 2011]]
[[op_fi:Japanin luonnonkatastrofi 2011]]
{{assessment|moderator=Jouni|stub=Yes}}
{{assessment|moderator=Jouni|stub=Yes}}
 
This page is a draft of an assessment about the '''Fukushima nuclear accident'''. Due to lack of participants, this assessment was never actually performed.
{{participants needed}}


==Scope==
==Scope==
Line 77: Line 76:
==See also==
==See also==
* [http://news.sciencemag.org/asiapacific/2015/03/food-supply-was-protected-after-fukushima-study-finds Food supply was protected after Fukushima, study finds] in Science Insider, March 2015.


==Keywords==
==Keywords==

Latest revision as of 11:33, 13 March 2015



This page is a draft of an assessment about the Fukushima nuclear accident. Due to lack of participants, this assessment was never actually performed.

Scope

Purpose

What should be done in the Fukushima nuclear accident that started from an earthquake and tsunami 13 March 2011?

Boundaries

Actions and impacts are looked at globally.

Scenarios

Not defined yet.

Intended users

  • General public. Advice is given about things anyone can do.
  • National authorities. Advice is given about what authorities should do and inform.
  • Media. Advice is given about what should be informed.


Participants

Result

Map of Fukushima's radiation risks.

Results

See should I take iodine tablets?

Conclusions

Not defined yet.

Rationale

File:Fukushima causal diagram.PNG
Add a legend for you diagram.

Decision variables

Indicators

Not defined yet.

[1]

Value variables

Not defined yet.

Other variables

Not defined yet.

Analyses

Not defined yet.

Indices

Not defined yet.

See also

Keywords

Radioactivity, accident, nuclear energy, Fukushima, iodine

References

Related files

<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>