Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (titles added)
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Scope===
== Scope ==


===Description===
'''Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation''' is a [[Help:Function|function]] that describes how to use the property 'natural' in priority setting. It is mainly used in ecological risk assessment.


===Definition===
=== Description ===


===Result===
What does natural mean?
 
*Opposition to man-made
*Opposition to technological
*Belongs to nature or is commin in nature
*Original state of the world, before or without the impact of humans.
 
Natural is preferred over non-natural.
 
== Definition ==
 
There is no effective way to use this function because the term natural is ambiguous.{{Reslink|Can 'natural' be effectively used as a criterion?}}
 
== Result ==
 
As a [[Help:Function|function]], there is a result only given some parameters, and the default values have not been defined.
 
[[Category:Costs_and_valuations|Variable:Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation]]

Latest revision as of 07:01, 22 August 2014

Scope

Using 'natural' as a criterion for prioritisation is a function that describes how to use the property 'natural' in priority setting. It is mainly used in ecological risk assessment.

Description

What does natural mean?

  • Opposition to man-made
  • Opposition to technological
  • Belongs to nature or is commin in nature
  • Original state of the world, before or without the impact of humans.

Natural is preferred over non-natural.

Definition

There is no effective way to use this function because the term natural is ambiguous.R↻

Result

As a function, there is a result only given some parameters, and the default values have not been defined.