Scientific quality (rating): Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(demo-test of editing the rating description scale)
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Scientific quality is a property of a page. This definition needs to be refined. This page is read automatically, and should contain at least two sentences to not confuse the script. This page should probably be protected once it is done.
[[Category:Opasnet]]


Scientific quality: clear scope, data coverage, good reasoning. Result covers all plausible hypotheses.
{|
{|
|+ Rating description table
|+ Rating description table
Line 6: Line 7:
! Description of rating
! Description of rating
|-
|-
| 20
| 10
| Very poor
| Misleading
|-
|-
| 40
| 20
| Inadequate
|-
| 35
| Poor
| Poor
|-
| 55
| Almost average
|-
|-
| 60
| 60
| Average
| Moderate
|-
|-
| 80
| 80
| Good
| Acceptable in peer review
|-
|-
| 100
| 100
| Outstanding
| Outstanding
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 11:56, 20 August 2014


Scientific quality: clear scope, data coverage, good reasoning. Result covers all plausible hypotheses.

Rating description table
Max rating Description of rating
10 Misleading
20 Inadequate
35 Poor
60 Moderate
80 Acceptable in peer review
100 Outstanding