Central product classification: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(code seems to work now)
(some description of CPC added)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Life cycle assessment]]
[[Category:Life cycle assessment]]
[[Category:Contains R code]]
{{variable|moderator=Jouni}}
{{variable|moderator=Jouni}}


Line 8: Line 9:
== Answer ==
== Answer ==


<rcode>
{{attack|#|Something wrong with the first-level codes (there is a leading zero although should not be). This was corrected, but is there more problems with the data?|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] ([[User talk:Jouni|talk]]) 23:05, 27 December 2013 (EET)}}
 
<rcode name="answer" label="Show classification levels 1-2" embed=1>
library(OpasnetUtils)
library(OpasnetUtils)
library(xtable)


objects.get("K4nyB3vNg9yQvtdy")
objects.latest("Op_en5914", code_name = "initiate")
 
CPC <- EvalOutput(CPC)
 
oprint(CPC@output[CPC@output$CPC.level < 3 , ])
 
oprint(head(CPC@output))
 
</rcode>
 
 
<rcode name="subclasses" label="Show lower classification levels" embed=1 variables="
name:class|description:Which class do you want to see in detail?|type:text|default:011
">
library(OpasnetUtils)
 
objects.latest("Op_en5914", code_name = "initiate")
 
CPC <- EvalOutput(CPC)
 
oprint(CPC@output[regexpr(class, CPC@output$CPC.code) == 1 , ])


print(xtable(head(CPC@output)), type = 'html')
</rcode>
</rcode>


== Rationale ==
== Rationale ==


UN CPC version 2 seems to be an optimal choice.  
UN CPC version 2 seems to be an optimal choice. It contains a hierarchical system for products, 4408 rows in total. It is organised in five hierarchical levels. It is based on ten categories at the top level, numbered from 0 to 9:
[http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/cpc-2.asp]
[http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/cpc-2.asp]
[http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regdntransfer.asp?f=130]
[http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regdntransfer.asp?f=130]
* Agriculture, forestry and fishery products
* Ores and minerals; electricity, gas and water
* Food products, beverages and tobacco; textiles, apparel and leather products
* Other transportable goods, except metal products, machinery and equipment
* Metal products, machinery and equipment
* Constructions and construction services
* Distributive trade services; accommodation, food and beverage serving services; transport services; and electricity, gas and water distribution services
* Financial and related services; real estate services; and rental and leasing services
* Business and production services
* Community, social and personal services


=== Dependencies ===
=== Dependencies ===
Line 27: Line 58:
===Calculations===
===Calculations===


<rcode name="calculations" label="Initiate variable">
<rcode name="initiate" label="Initiate variable" embed=1>
library(OpasnetUtils)
library(OpasnetUtils)
library(xtable)


CPC <- Ovariable("CPC", ddata = "Op_en5914")
dat <- opbase.data("Op_en5914")
CPC@output <- CPC@data
dat$CPC.name <- dat$Result
objects.put(CPC)
temp <- levels(dat$CPC.name)
temp <- gsub("\r", "", temp)
levels(dat$CPC.name) <- temp
dat$Result <- 1
temp2 <- as.character(levels(dat$CPC.code)[dat$CPC.code])
temp2[c(318, 416, 1016, 1734)] <- c("1", "2", "3", "4")
dat$CPC.code <- as.factor(temp2)
dat$CPC.level <- nchar(temp2)
 
CPC <- Ovariable("CPC", data = dat)
 
objects.store(CPC)


cat("Ovariable CPC created.\n")
cat("Ovariable CPC created.\n")
print(xtable(head(CPC@output)), type = 'html')


</rcode>
</rcode>

Latest revision as of 13:09, 13 March 2014



Question

What is a good classification system for products?

Answer

⇤--#: . Something wrong with the first-level codes (there is a leading zero although should not be). This was corrected, but is there more problems with the data? --Jouni (talk) 23:05, 27 December 2013 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: attack)

+ Show code


Which class do you want to see in detail?:

+ Show code

Rationale

UN CPC version 2 seems to be an optimal choice. It contains a hierarchical system for products, 4408 rows in total. It is organised in five hierarchical levels. It is based on ten categories at the top level, numbered from 0 to 9: [1] [2]

  • Agriculture, forestry and fishery products
  • Ores and minerals; electricity, gas and water
  • Food products, beverages and tobacco; textiles, apparel and leather products
  • Other transportable goods, except metal products, machinery and equipment
  • Metal products, machinery and equipment
  • Constructions and construction services
  • Distributive trade services; accommodation, food and beverage serving services; transport services; and electricity, gas and water distribution services
  • Financial and related services; real estate services; and rental and leasing services
  • Business and production services
  • Community, social and personal services

Dependencies

Calculations

+ Show code

See also

Keywords

References


Related files

<mfanonymousfilelist></mfanonymousfilelist>