Talk:Risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipal solid waste incinerator: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(empty discussions removed)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This page contains the discussions related to a '''risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipality solid waste incinenator'''. To start a new discussion, copy the template below into a new place in the edit mode.
This page contains the discussions related to a '''risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipality solid waste incinenator'''. To start a new discussion, copy the template below into a new place in the edit mode.
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
==Objective==
===Variable: RA of Hämeenkyrö MSWI===
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
=====Discussion on the focus of Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
=====Discussion on the scope of Hämeenkyrö MSWI risk assessment=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
===General variables===
#Precautionary principle (disagreement)
## PP based on expected value, general
## PP based on worst-case or another 'conservative' scenario, general
## PP applied to emissions of municipal solid wasti incinerator (MSWI) in Hämeenkyrö
#Intake fraction (disambiguation)
##iF based on measured concentration fields
##iF based on exposure monitoring
##iF based on shortcuts
===Fine particle variables===
====PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions in Hämeenkyrö====
Päivi
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from MSWI, biofuel plant, and natural gas plant in Hämeenkyrö====
Tommi
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====Baseline PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure in Hämeenkyrö====
Anne K
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö ====
Terhi Y
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure-response function on population level ====
Sari
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
===Dioxin variables===
====Dioxin emissions in Hämeenkyrö ====
Virpi
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====Baseline dioxin exposure in Hämeenkyrö ====
Marjo
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====Dioxin exposure due to MSWI in Hämeenkyrö ====
Martin
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====Dioxin exposure-response function on population level ====
Sanna
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
===Indicator variables===
*Decisions related to Hämeenkyrö case
*Possible indicators (optimising variables) in Hämeenkyrö
====Well-being of the population (smells, comfort, noise) ====
Kari  Auri
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        = Focus: proposal to how to define the focus of this variable
|Statement    = Direct or indirect information about the factors affecting peoples living comfortability related to waste management alternatives (disposal site or MSWI). Direct variables are modelled or measured (ie. noise map) and indicators are based on feedback from local people or from other indirect source.
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation = If the decision model will be used to analyse alternative scenarios, we have to include both modelled variables and feedback variables here or alternatively define these own variable for the Pyrkilö -model.
}}
{{Resolution
|Topic        = Scope: proposal to how to define the scope
|Statement    = Areas related to alternative waste management systems in Pirkanmaa. Thus, focus will be on existing dumping place (Tarastejärvi) and planned MSWI plant in Hämeenkyrö. Modelled variables will be estimated using different time scales (day, month, year). Well-being indicators will be monitored continuosly and summarizing reports can be done monthly and annually. People can also be asked what kind of changes in comfortability factors they believe to happen in future when a certain waste management alternative is implemented. 
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation = MSWI and dumping site alternatives have diffent total noise and smell effects for people living near the emission source. Both should be analysed before final solution.
}}
{{Resolution
|Topic        = Discription: some ideas of different factors (both a: direct variables and b: indicators)
|Statement    = Variables
1 Noise
a) modelled noise maps / control noise measurements in neighborhoods of site based on:
- estimated amount of traffic near waste treatment site
- noise emissions from operating incinerator
- extra noise from birds (near landfill site)
Inputs: waste collection data, emission data from plant, bird invetory and voice emission data
b) noise distubance asked from local people
- how often people suffer from noise?
- continuous or episodic noise?
Inputs: Indicator data from systematic post questionaries and continuous feedback forms from web-site.
2 Smell
3 Sosial factors
4 Scenic values
5 Discomfort index
6 Concern index (Health effects)
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====Effects on economy (esp. gas energy plant)  ====
Juha
=====Discussion on effect on economy=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        = other effects of MSWI on economical issues
|Statement    = There might be other effects on economy, totally new due to the MSWI
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation = Probably it could be possible to use also ash produced by MSWI? In Elimäki new factory was started where they produce forest fertilizer from the ash, which means that ash is not waste any longer but can be used (in case it is clear enough to be spread on the ground). -Sanna
}}
====Transportation costs of waste ====
Anne
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====Health effects of dioxins and PM<sub>2.5</sub> ====
Anu T
=====Discussion on short term effects of dioxins=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        = Short term effects of dioxins
|Statement    = Short term effects of dioxins are irrelevant, because the question is not about acute poisonings
|Outcome      = Short term effects of dioxins are irrelevant, because the question is not about acute poisonings
|Argumentation =
{{Defend|Short term effects of dioxins only occur when the acute doses exceed the current background exposures by several orders of magnitude. This kind of exposures are not possible in the case of MSWI, and they can be excluded.|--[[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 10:33, 21 September 2006 (EEST), Anu}}
}}
===Miscellaneous variables===
*Secondary effects on waste separation, recycling etc.)
====Municipal solid waste production in Häme ====
Pasi K
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====Existing MSWI plants and current plans in southern Finland ====
Marjaleena
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}
====Background of waste production and its relations to EU directive ====
Eva
=====Discussion on ...=====
{{Resolution
|Topic        =
|Statement    =
|Outcome      =
|Argumentation =
}}

Latest revision as of 20:29, 1 January 2007

This page contains the discussions related to a risk assessment on Hämeenkyrö municipality solid waste incinenator. To start a new discussion, copy the template below into a new place in the edit mode.