Talk:ERF of PM2.5 on mortality in general population: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Peer review)
 
(peer review moved from the main page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Peer review ==
== Peer review ==
{{peer review
|reviewers  = [[User:Jouni|Jouni]] 16:43, 18 August 2009 (EEST)
|class      = Technical report
|respect    = 3
|evaluation  = ;Scope: It should be specified which causes, or use all causes.
;Main content: There are newer estimates, such as Cooke et al., EST 2008.
|version    = http://en.opasnet.org/en-opwiki/index.php?title=ERF_of_PM2.5_on_mortality_in_general_population&oldid=10798
}}


{{discussion
{{discussion

Latest revision as of 19:27, 20 March 2010

Peer review

Peer review
A version of this page has been peer reviewed.
The page belongs to class Technical report.
The amount of respect is 3 onors.

Evaluation:

Scope
It should be specified which causes, or use all causes.
Main content
There are newer estimates, such as Cooke et al., EST 2008.

Reviewers: Jouni 16:43, 18 August 2009 (EEST)

The basis for the review is the quality and applicability of content for a potential reader. The target population may be different for different classes. See possible classes and typical respects.



How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: Scope should be clarified and newer references should be added.

Closing statement: Resolution not yet found.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←--1: . The causes within scope should be defined, or all causes should be included. --Jouni 16:48, 18 August 2009 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

←--2: . For example Cooke et al ( ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Volume: 41 Issue: 18 Pages: 6598-6605 Published: SEP 15 2007 ) shows a synthesis of ERFs for PM2.5. This reference should be used. --Jouni 16:48, 18 August 2009 (EEST) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)