User talk:Juha Villman: Difference between revisions

From Opasnet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(resolution)
(parameters updated)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


{{discussion
{{discussion
|Dispute= There is no need for a page protection template.
|Statements = There is no need for a page protection template.
|Outcome= Accepted.
|Resolution = Accepted.
|Argumentation =
|Argumentation =
{{defend|1|Using accesscontrol -tags is already quite simple|--[[User:Juha Villman|Juha Villman]] 11:59, 12 November 2008 (EET)}}
{{defend|1|Using accesscontrol -tags is already quite simple|--[[User:Juha Villman|Juha Villman]] 11:59, 12 November 2008 (EET)}}

Latest revision as of 17:06, 3 January 2010

Create a page protection template

How to read discussions

Fact discussion: .
Opening statement: There is no need for a page protection template.

Closing statement: Accepted.

(A closing statement, when resolved, should be updated to the main page.)

Argumentation:

←--1: . Using accesscontrol -tags is already quite simple --Juha Villman 11:59, 12 November 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)

←--2: . Now that the idea is to protect project namespaces, there is little use for a template. --Jouni 23:21, 21 November 2008 (EET) (type: truth; paradigms: science: defence)